<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Time testing on system in Operating System - OpenVMS</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/time-testing-on-system/m-p/3860723#M78912</link>
    <description>If you change time for only one member of the cluster, you should have a problem with the queue_manager, which is runing on one member. Queue_manager sets the time of entry.&lt;BR /&gt;Check SHOW QUEUE/MANAGER.&lt;BR /&gt;Petr</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 03:42:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Petr Spisek</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-09-12T03:42:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Time testing on system</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/time-testing-on-system/m-p/3860720#M78909</link>
      <description>Here is a new one that I have never seen before.  We have a new environment that we used to test the time drift for the daylights saving time change.  Because we are a 24x7x365.25 location we have to drift our time.  The OS is 8.2.  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We performed our time drift forward and everything worked ok.  We then brought the time back to normal time and rebooted the cluster.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Now I am seeing an odd behavior with the queue manager.  I do not want to nuke the queue manager and recreate it (like I said - we are 24x7...).  The problem is that if I submit a batch job to run with a time before the current time it is submitting the time as 1-nov-2006.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Example:&lt;BR /&gt;$ show entry 588&lt;BR /&gt;  Entry  Jobname         Username     Blocks  Status&lt;BR /&gt;  -----  -------         --------     ------  ------&lt;BR /&gt;    588  Security Report SYSTEM               Holding until 30-SEP-2006 00:00:00.00&lt;BR /&gt;         On idle batch queue SYS$BATCH_CADDO&lt;BR /&gt;$ set entry 588/after="11-sep-2006"&lt;BR /&gt;$ show entry 588&lt;BR /&gt;  Entry  Jobname         Username     Blocks  Status&lt;BR /&gt;  -----  -------         --------     ------  ------&lt;BR /&gt;    588  Security Report SYSTEM               Holding until  1-NOV-2006 23:51:56.09&lt;BR /&gt;         On idle batch queue SYS$BATCH_CADDO&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;-----------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;I am thinking that the queue manager has the time of 1-nov-2006 23:51:56 as the last valid time so it is putting the new time as that time.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Any ideas on how to clear that up without nuking and recreating the queue manager?&lt;BR /&gt;Has anyone ever seen this before?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I know on the 7.3-1 systems (last valid OS we did time drift testing with) when you submit for the previous time it still knew the current time as the last valid time.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 15:57:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/time-testing-on-system/m-p/3860720#M78909</guid>
      <dc:creator>Peter Zeiszler</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-09-11T15:57:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Time testing on system</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/time-testing-on-system/m-p/3860721#M78910</link>
      <description>Peter,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;  I don't think I understand where the "1-NOV-2006" comes from.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;  You should be able to fail over the queue manager without interrupting anything:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;$ SHOW QUEUE/MANAGER/FULL&lt;BR /&gt;$ START/QUEUE/MANAGER&lt;BR /&gt;$ SHOW QUEUE/MANAGER/FULL&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;  If it doesn't restart, try specifying /ON=(node1,node2,...) where the first entry on the list is different from the current node. If you need it to run on a specific node, you can then fail it back to the normal list immediately. See HELP START/QUEUE/MANAGER/ON &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;"Despite the transition, queues on the running nodes are not stopped. All requests to the queuing system, for example, PRINT, SUBMIT and SHOW ENTRY requests will complete as expected".&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 20:48:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/time-testing-on-system/m-p/3860721#M78910</guid>
      <dc:creator>John Gillings</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-09-11T20:48:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Time testing on system</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/time-testing-on-system/m-p/3860722#M78911</link>
      <description>Peter,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;How EXACTLY did you perform your time drift&lt;BR /&gt;forward and how EXACTLY did you bring it back&lt;BR /&gt;to normal?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have drifted systems forward and back and&lt;BR /&gt;have not seen any problems...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Dave&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 01:13:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/time-testing-on-system/m-p/3860722#M78911</guid>
      <dc:creator>David B Sneddon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-09-12T01:13:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Time testing on system</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/time-testing-on-system/m-p/3860723#M78912</link>
      <description>If you change time for only one member of the cluster, you should have a problem with the queue_manager, which is runing on one member. Queue_manager sets the time of entry.&lt;BR /&gt;Check SHOW QUEUE/MANAGER.&lt;BR /&gt;Petr</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 03:42:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/time-testing-on-system/m-p/3860723#M78912</guid>
      <dc:creator>Petr Spisek</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-09-12T03:42:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Time testing on system</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/time-testing-on-system/m-p/3860724#M78913</link>
      <description>We set the clock on the one system forward to October 31.  We then started up our normal applications.  We know we have issues with specific programs during this change so have them shutdown (i.e. DCE$DTSD).  We then ran the macro that changes the clock cycle so that after 6 hours the clock has only gone forward 5 hours for an overall effect of falling back one hour.  Then we changed the TimeZone logicals and verified everything was working.  We let the system run normally under a load to verify no errors.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;To put the time back to normal time we shutdown all of our applications, set the time to the real current time, then we rebooted the system.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We have already shutdown the complete cluster.  The queue manager file is on a common disk and one of our tests was to move the queue manager around to each of the 3 systems to verify that each of the systems ran the queue manager properly.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;All 3 systems have the correct current time.  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;-------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;$ show que/full/manager&lt;BR /&gt;Master file:  CLSTR_COMMON:[VMS$COMMON]QMAN$MASTER.DAT;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Queue manager SYS$QUEUE_MANAGER, running, on CREEK::&lt;BR /&gt;  /ON=(CREEK,CADDO,TEJAS)&lt;BR /&gt;  Database location:  CLSTR_COMMON:[VMS$COMMON]&lt;BR /&gt;-----------------------&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 10:58:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/time-testing-on-system/m-p/3860724#M78913</guid>
      <dc:creator>Peter Zeiszler</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-09-12T10:58:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Time testing on system</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/time-testing-on-system/m-p/3860725#M78914</link>
      <description>I don't remember what time the system was when we moved the time back to normal time.  I would have to guess that the clock was "1-NOV-2006 23:51:56.09" when we did a set time on the system prior to rebooting.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This is the first system we have done the time drift testing with on OpenVMS 8.2.  We have never seen this problem on the older OS.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;One other step I forgot to mention.  After we moved the time back to normal and did a reboot we also anal/disk/repair all disks so that it cleans up any issues with files created in the future.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We also did not have our console manager connected to the system during this testing (cabling wasn't done yet).  So I may have no evidence of the date &amp;amp; time of when we flipped the clock back to normal time.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 11:09:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/time-testing-on-system/m-p/3860725#M78914</guid>
      <dc:creator>Peter Zeiszler</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-09-12T11:09:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Time testing on system</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/time-testing-on-system/m-p/3860726#M78915</link>
      <description>We also drifted all 3 nodes in the cluster at the same time.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This isn't impacting us (well it hit me on a couple batch jobs I submitted as all), its just strange and we never seen this before.  Since I don't have another system at 8.2 to use for testing I can't even attempt to reproduce it.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If anyone has an idea where the time comes from that would be nice to know.  Or if anyone has done this type of test and is getting similiar results I would be interested in also.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 11:27:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/time-testing-on-system/m-p/3860726#M78915</guid>
      <dc:creator>Peter Zeiszler</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-09-12T11:27:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

