<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Multiple interfaces and Spanning Tree in Operating System - OpenVMS</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/multiple-interfaces-and-spanning-tree/m-p/3911963#M80600</link>
    <description>I personally don't like VLANs.  Having two separate&lt;BR /&gt;devices also removes a single point of failure.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Dave&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:44:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>David B Sneddon</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-12-12T20:44:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Multiple interfaces and Spanning Tree</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/multiple-interfaces-and-spanning-tree/m-p/3911960#M80597</link>
      <description>I have a cluster of 3 ES80s on Fibre Channel and running SCS ofer Ethernet LAN. I have multiple NICs on each machine, but only one NIC on each node is currently connected to a network switch (using a VLAN). I intended to connect second interface on each node to the same VLAN for redundancy assuming a Spanning Tree Protocol would be ran disabling one of the NICs at any given time. I intended to run IPsafe on it to fail-over the IP address.&lt;BR /&gt;Somebody told me he is "almost 100% sure" VMS on Alpha does NOT support the spanning tree algorithm. I find it mind-boggling! Is it true?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'd appreciate any help. Specifically, if this is true, can I have a fully redundant LAN interconnect i.e connect the 3 WE0s to one VLAN and the 3 WE1s to another, separate VLAN and hope the cluster does not fail if one of the VLANs fail?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;THanks&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Ziggy</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 19:50:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/multiple-interfaces-and-spanning-tree/m-p/3911960#M80597</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ziggy Filek</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-12-12T19:50:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple interfaces and Spanning Tree</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/multiple-interfaces-and-spanning-tree/m-p/3911961#M80598</link>
      <description>Why not just get another hub/switch and connect&lt;BR /&gt;the second NICs to that device -- totally separate&lt;BR /&gt;and should keep the cluster going if you have any&lt;BR /&gt;VLAN problems.&lt;BR /&gt;Don't configure any IP or DECnet on these, use&lt;BR /&gt;them only for SCS traffic.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Dave&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:06:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/multiple-interfaces-and-spanning-tree/m-p/3911961#M80598</guid>
      <dc:creator>David B Sneddon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-12-12T20:06:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple interfaces and Spanning Tree</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/multiple-interfaces-and-spanning-tree/m-p/3911962#M80599</link>
      <description>Dave: The Spanning Tree Protocol prevents loops on the LAN. It does not matter whether you connect the second NIC to another switch: as long as both NICs are in the same broadcast domain (as they must be for SCS to work), both switches must be connected, therefore forming a loop with your twin connection. That's why I contemplated two parallel VLAN's on the same switch (which by the way is fully equivalent to having two totally separate LANs implemented using 2 totally separate sets of switches).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Ziggy</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:16:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/multiple-interfaces-and-spanning-tree/m-p/3911962#M80599</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ziggy Filek</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-12-12T20:16:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple interfaces and Spanning Tree</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/multiple-interfaces-and-spanning-tree/m-p/3911963#M80600</link>
      <description>I personally don't like VLANs.  Having two separate&lt;BR /&gt;devices also removes a single point of failure.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Dave&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:44:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/multiple-interfaces-and-spanning-tree/m-p/3911963#M80600</guid>
      <dc:creator>David B Sneddon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-12-12T20:44:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple interfaces and Spanning Tree</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/multiple-interfaces-and-spanning-tree/m-p/3911964#M80601</link>
      <description>Somebody told me he is "almost 100% sure" VMS on Alpha does NOT support the spanning tree algorithm. I find it mind-boggling! Is it true?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Yes. Spanning tree is part of the 802.1 standard for bridges. Naturally, a normal host doesn't support it; why should it?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:13:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/multiple-interfaces-and-spanning-tree/m-p/3911964#M80601</guid>
      <dc:creator>Richard Brodie_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-12-13T09:13:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple interfaces and Spanning Tree</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/multiple-interfaces-and-spanning-tree/m-p/3911965#M80602</link>
      <description>Richard: Yes, if it does not pass frames between interfaces, then it's not a bridge.&lt;BR /&gt;Maybe I should rephrase the question: Can multiple active NICs on an Alpha be connected to the same LAN for the purpose of running redundant SCS communications with other nodes in the cluster?&lt;BR /&gt;The IP issue is irrelevant here, since FailsafeIP can handle it.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:30:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/multiple-interfaces-and-spanning-tree/m-p/3911965#M80602</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ziggy Filek</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-12-13T13:30:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple interfaces and Spanning Tree</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/multiple-interfaces-and-spanning-tree/m-p/3911966#M80603</link>
      <description>"Can multiple active NICs on an Alpha be connected to the same LAN for the purpose of running redundant SCS communications with other nodes in the cluster?"&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;OK, the answer to that question is that you can pretty much make any arbitrary topology, as long as all the nodes share a LAN somewhere, pairwise. If you have a spare  dual NIC you could even make point-to-point connections as a backup. Otherwise, connecting to separate switches and tying the switches together works well, unless something DoSses your LAN.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 04:46:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/multiple-interfaces-and-spanning-tree/m-p/3911966#M80603</guid>
      <dc:creator>Richard Brodie_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-12-14T04:46:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple interfaces and Spanning Tree</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/multiple-interfaces-and-spanning-tree/m-p/3911967#M80604</link>
      <description>&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;  Can multiple active NICs on an Alpha be connected to the same LAN for the purpose of running redundant SCS communications with other nodes in the cluster?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Yes - and by default SCS use all NICs to form a redundant/shared connection between cluster nodes. All NICs with same performance (SCS rating based on speed, delay, reliability) then form a virtual circuit(s) to other node(s) in cluster.  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You can see formed channels (NIC to NIC) via 'mc scacp sho chann' and virtual circuit (bundles of NICs) via 'mc scacp show vc' - depends on VMS version.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Jiri</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 04:51:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/multiple-interfaces-and-spanning-tree/m-p/3911967#M80604</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jiri Zelenka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-12-14T04:51:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

