<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Backup encryption + zlib = mess in Operating System - OpenVMS</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/backup-encryption-zlib-mess/m-p/4095419#M87019</link>
    <description>Guy Peleg e.g. on his TUD speeches has told, that compression and encryption is currently not supported.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;regards kalle</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 01:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Karl Rohwedder</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-11-01T01:26:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Backup encryption + zlib = mess</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/backup-encryption-zlib-mess/m-p/4095417#M87017</link>
      <description>Being a big fan of both encryption and disk-based backups, I decided to try simultaneously encrypting and (undocumented) compressing a save set, like so:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;BACKUP *.TXT SAVESET.SAV/SAVE /DATA_FORMAT=COMPRESS /ENCRYPT=NAME=MYKEY&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The result?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;%BACKUP-I-COMPRESS, data compressed by 0%&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;HP is encrypting the data before compressing it.  If they did the reverse, there would actually be some compression.  Now how the heck do I recommend a fix for an undocumented feature before it becomes official in, I guess, 8.3-1?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:07:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/backup-encryption-zlib-mess/m-p/4095417#M87017</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephen Eickhoff_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-31T17:07:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Backup encryption + zlib = mess</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/backup-encryption-zlib-mess/m-p/4095418#M87018</link>
      <description>As a note, it is possible to use only compression first, then ENCRYPT the saveset file; but that has the disadvantage of displaying errors as if the save set was corrupted if you forget to decrypt it first.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:13:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/backup-encryption-zlib-mess/m-p/4095418#M87018</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephen Eickhoff_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-31T17:13:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Backup encryption + zlib = mess</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/backup-encryption-zlib-mess/m-p/4095419#M87019</link>
      <description>Guy Peleg e.g. on his TUD speeches has told, that compression and encryption is currently not supported.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;regards kalle</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 01:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/backup-encryption-zlib-mess/m-p/4095419#M87019</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karl Rohwedder</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-11-01T01:26:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

