<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Datatrieve Access Violation. ACCVIO error. in Operating System - OpenVMS</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/datatrieve-access-violation-accvio-error/m-p/3705725#M8849</link>
    <description>When running a big and complex procedure (READY of 34 domains) in Datatrieve (v7.2), it dumps with an access violation after adding and IF and FOR statement to read the 34th domain.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;DTR&amp;gt; :downl-miles-ctr&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;%SYSTEM-F-ACCVIO, access violation, reason mask=00, virtual address=000000000860&lt;BR /&gt;%SYSTEM-F-ACCVIO, access violation, reason mask=70, virtual address=200000000000&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;  Improperly handled condition, image exit forced.&lt;BR /&gt;    Signal arguments:   Number = 0000000000000003&lt;BR /&gt;                        Name   = 000000000000000C&lt;BR /&gt;                                 000000000014ED70&lt;BR /&gt;                                 200000000000001B&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;    Register dump:&lt;BR /&gt;    R0  = 0000000000000000  R1  = 0000000000100000  R2  = 00000000000F0960&lt;BR /&gt;    R3  = 0000000000414240  R4  = 0000000000374908  R5  = 0000000000000001&lt;BR /&gt;    R6  = 0000000000039624  R7  = 00000000008D8216  R8  = 0000000000035A54&lt;BR /&gt;    R9  = 000000000000000C  R10 = 000000000000000C  R11 = 0000000000000001&lt;BR /&gt;    R12 = 0000000000000000  R13 = 000000007AFB8340  R14 = 0000000000000000&lt;BR /&gt;    R15 = 000000007AFB79A0  R16 = 000000000000000C  R17 = 0000000000000003&lt;BR /&gt;    R18 = 000000007BB9475C  R19 = 000000007FFEFF98  R20 = 0000000000000000&lt;BR /&gt;    R21 = 0000000000000000  R22 = 0000000000000001  R23 = 0000000000000000&lt;BR /&gt;    R24 = 0000000000000000  R25 = 0000000000000001  R26 = 000000000014ED70&lt;BR /&gt;    R27 = 000000007B516E50  R28 = 200000000000001B  R29 = 000000007AF11760&lt;BR /&gt;    SP  = 000000007AF11760  PC  = 000000000014ED70  PS  = 200000000000001B&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;When putting the FOR in comment and only keep the IF statement, following error occurs :&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;DTR&amp;gt; :downl_miles_ctr&lt;BR /&gt;Stack overflow, PC=0000000000000001, PS=00000000&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Has anyone an idea why ?</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 05:17:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>John Vercamer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-01-10T05:17:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Datatrieve Access Violation. ACCVIO error.</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/datatrieve-access-violation-accvio-error/m-p/3705725#M8849</link>
      <description>When running a big and complex procedure (READY of 34 domains) in Datatrieve (v7.2), it dumps with an access violation after adding and IF and FOR statement to read the 34th domain.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;DTR&amp;gt; :downl-miles-ctr&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;%SYSTEM-F-ACCVIO, access violation, reason mask=00, virtual address=000000000860&lt;BR /&gt;%SYSTEM-F-ACCVIO, access violation, reason mask=70, virtual address=200000000000&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;  Improperly handled condition, image exit forced.&lt;BR /&gt;    Signal arguments:   Number = 0000000000000003&lt;BR /&gt;                        Name   = 000000000000000C&lt;BR /&gt;                                 000000000014ED70&lt;BR /&gt;                                 200000000000001B&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;    Register dump:&lt;BR /&gt;    R0  = 0000000000000000  R1  = 0000000000100000  R2  = 00000000000F0960&lt;BR /&gt;    R3  = 0000000000414240  R4  = 0000000000374908  R5  = 0000000000000001&lt;BR /&gt;    R6  = 0000000000039624  R7  = 00000000008D8216  R8  = 0000000000035A54&lt;BR /&gt;    R9  = 000000000000000C  R10 = 000000000000000C  R11 = 0000000000000001&lt;BR /&gt;    R12 = 0000000000000000  R13 = 000000007AFB8340  R14 = 0000000000000000&lt;BR /&gt;    R15 = 000000007AFB79A0  R16 = 000000000000000C  R17 = 0000000000000003&lt;BR /&gt;    R18 = 000000007BB9475C  R19 = 000000007FFEFF98  R20 = 0000000000000000&lt;BR /&gt;    R21 = 0000000000000000  R22 = 0000000000000001  R23 = 0000000000000000&lt;BR /&gt;    R24 = 0000000000000000  R25 = 0000000000000001  R26 = 000000000014ED70&lt;BR /&gt;    R27 = 000000007B516E50  R28 = 200000000000001B  R29 = 000000007AF11760&lt;BR /&gt;    SP  = 000000007AF11760  PC  = 000000000014ED70  PS  = 200000000000001B&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;When putting the FOR in comment and only keep the IF statement, following error occurs :&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;DTR&amp;gt; :downl_miles_ctr&lt;BR /&gt;Stack overflow, PC=0000000000000001, PS=00000000&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Has anyone an idea why ?</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 05:17:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/datatrieve-access-violation-accvio-error/m-p/3705725#M8849</guid>
      <dc:creator>John Vercamer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-10T05:17:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Datatrieve Access Violation. ACCVIO error.</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/datatrieve-access-violation-accvio-error/m-p/3705726#M8850</link>
      <description>Improperly handled quota exceeded ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Wim</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 07:32:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/datatrieve-access-violation-accvio-error/m-p/3705726#M8850</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wim Van den Wyngaert</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-10T07:32:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Datatrieve Access Violation. ACCVIO error.</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/datatrieve-access-violation-accvio-error/m-p/3705727#M8851</link>
      <description>And what do you mean with "quota exceeded" ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am not very familiar with VMS technical issues.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks, John</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 04:11:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/datatrieve-access-violation-accvio-error/m-p/3705727#M8851</guid>
      <dc:creator>John Vercamer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-12T04:11:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Datatrieve Access Violation. ACCVIO error.</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/datatrieve-access-violation-accvio-error/m-p/3705728#M8852</link>
      <description>If you do &lt;BR /&gt;$ sh proc/quota&lt;BR /&gt;you'll see a number of limitations for your process such as open file. This limit comes from the user definition. If it is too low, you are unable to open files behind a certain point. Post the output of this and&lt;BR /&gt;"mc authorize show [userid]" if you need help.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Wim</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 07:41:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/datatrieve-access-violation-accvio-error/m-p/3705728#M8852</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wim Van den Wyngaert</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-12T07:41:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Datatrieve Access Violation. ACCVIO error.</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/datatrieve-access-violation-accvio-error/m-p/3705729#M8853</link>
      <description>sh process _TNA3452: /quota&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Process Quotas:&lt;BR /&gt; Account name: LEASE   &lt;BR /&gt; CPU limit:                      Infinite  Direct I/O limit:       150&lt;BR /&gt; Buffered I/O byte count quota:     92832  Buffered I/O limit:     150&lt;BR /&gt; Timer queue entry quota:              10  Open file quota:         63&lt;BR /&gt; Paging file quota:               1757024  Subprocess quota:        10&lt;BR /&gt; Default page fault cluster:           64  AST quota:              246&lt;BR /&gt; Enqueue quota:                      1870  Shared file limit:        0&lt;BR /&gt; Max detached processes:                0  Max active jobs:          0&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;----------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;MC AUTHORIZE info :&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;CLI:      DCL                              Tables: DCLTABLES&lt;BR /&gt;Flags: &lt;BR /&gt;Maxjobs:         0  Fillm:       100  Bytlm:        64000&lt;BR /&gt;Maxacctjobs:     0  Shrfillm:      0  Pbytlm:           0&lt;BR /&gt;Maxdetach:       0  BIOlm:       150  JTquota:       4096&lt;BR /&gt;Prclm:           8  DIOlm:       150  WSdef:         2000&lt;BR /&gt;Prio:            4  ASTlm:       250  WSquo:         4000&lt;BR /&gt;Queprio:         4  TQElm:        10  WSextent:     16384&lt;BR /&gt;CPU:        (none)  Enqlm:      2000  Pgflquo:    2000000&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:26:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/datatrieve-access-violation-accvio-error/m-p/3705729#M8853</guid>
      <dc:creator>John Vercamer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-12T10:26:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Datatrieve Access Violation. ACCVIO error.</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/datatrieve-access-violation-accvio-error/m-p/3705730#M8854</link>
      <description>John,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm practically ignorant on Datatrieve, but&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;WELCOME to the VMS forum!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Proost.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Have one on me.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;jpe</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:18:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/datatrieve-access-violation-accvio-error/m-p/3705730#M8854</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jan van den Ende</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-12T14:18:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

