<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: OpenVms/Telnet problem with many concurrent interactive connections requests in Operating System - OpenVMS</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-telnet-problem-with-many-concurrent-interactive/m-p/4192346#M89792</link>
    <description>Maurizio,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I would recommend that the problem be approached by looking carefully at real data, not by changing parameters that have been quite acceptable in the past. While it is quite possible that changes may be needed, it is far safer to make those changes based upon facts.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I would obtain an appropriate Ethernet HUB (not a switch). If managed switches are in use, then there are likely settings allowing traffic to be replicated.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I would then put a network analyzer  (e.g., WireShark; which is freeware and available for download) on the line between the OpenVMS system and the network infrastructure. When the problem occurs, it will then be possible to see precisely what is (and what is not) happening. Save the resulting trace file to disk for analysis.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Many things could be causing this problem. Not all of them involve the OpenVMS system. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Also if there is a shortage of internal expertise on looking at network traces, consider whether outside resources should be retained (disclosure: My firm provides such services, as do the firms affiliated with several other active contributors to ITRC).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;- Bob Gezelter, &lt;A href="http://www.rlgsc.com" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.rlgsc.com&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 12:27:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Robert Gezelter</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-05-06T12:27:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>OpenVms/Telnet problem with many concurrent interactive connections requests</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-telnet-problem-with-many-concurrent-interactive/m-p/4192340#M89786</link>
      <description>An old ES40 Alphaserver, with OpenVms 7.3 and tcpip 5.1, for many years don't have any problems with telnet connections, now, on the morning (ony few days, expecially on Monday) when over 100 users try to login on to the system, this don't prompt for the "Username", wait without any response for few minutes, and finally reject the connection. Ony few users at time can connect, and to login all the users half hour need. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;After 30-40 minutes, the problem is solved. The normal time connection (less one second) is established, for any user want to open a new session.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I just verify the Telnet LIMIT parameter and other parameters: arUe all correct. &lt;BR /&gt;Unfortunately, for other problems, the customer cannot upgrade the OpenVms and TCPIP versions.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;On the same network there are others OpenVms system, that normally reply to the telnet connections requests of the same clients, on the same time when ES40 don't reply.  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;All users use the Ericom PowerTerm525 Telnet Emulator, installed on all WindowsXp clients. &lt;BR /&gt;Note that also from the Windows command prompt, the problem is the same. To exclude name resolution problems (DNS name, Netbios name), i try directly with ip address, but the problem is the same.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 10:11:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-telnet-problem-with-many-concurrent-interactive/m-p/4192340#M89786</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maurizio Rondina</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-05-06T10:11:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OpenVms/Telnet problem with many concurrent interactive connections requests</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-telnet-problem-with-many-concurrent-interactive/m-p/4192341#M89787</link>
      <description>$ ucx show nam&lt;BR /&gt;Is the "timeout" low, e.g. less 4 sec ?&lt;BR /&gt;What is the value of retry ?&lt;BR /&gt;Are all dns servers specified present (ping) ? Try swapping the specified servers (e.g. S1,S2 becomes S2,S1).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Note that for IP adresses you have reverse address lookup.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Can you do a tcptrace /prot=ip/fu/pack=10000 between VMS and a PC and post that ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Wim</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 10:18:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-telnet-problem-with-many-concurrent-interactive/m-p/4192341#M89787</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wim Van den Wyngaert</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-05-06T10:18:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OpenVms/Telnet problem with many concurrent interactive connections requests</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-telnet-problem-with-many-concurrent-interactive/m-p/4192342#M89788</link>
      <description>&amp;gt; To exclude name resolution problems (DNS&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; name, Netbios name), i try directly with&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; ip address, [...]&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If the Telnet server tries to do a reverse&lt;BR /&gt;(number-to-name) look-up on the client, then&lt;BR /&gt;it won't matter whether you specify the&lt;BR /&gt;server by name or by address.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; [...] and finally reject the connection.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Actual error message?</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 10:52:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-telnet-problem-with-many-concurrent-interactive/m-p/4192342#M89788</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven Schweda</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-05-06T10:52:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OpenVms/Telnet problem with many concurrent interactive connections requests</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-telnet-problem-with-many-concurrent-interactive/m-p/4192343#M89789</link>
      <description>Wim, results of TCPIP show man parameters is:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Retry: 4&lt;BR /&gt;Timeout: 4&lt;BR /&gt;Servers: A1, 192.168.1.9&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Retry and timeout, are the defaults.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Server A1 repond to ping, is the same openVms system&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Server 192.168.1.9 do not respond to ping, so I remove it from the BIND Resolver, shutdown and restart the BIND tcpip service, but it remain on the output of TCPIP SHOW NAM command.... So I try with the TCPIP$BINDsetup.com procedure, and now the TCPIP SHOW NAM command give: &lt;BR /&gt;Server: LOCALHOST&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The customer say me that the 192.168.1.9 server was replaced with 192.168.1.11 dns server, a newer Windows 2003 Active Directory DNS Server.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;They says that now the BIND/DNS server is not more necessary on the ES40.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;for the tcptrace command results, i cannot sent to you: the verb/symbol is not recognize on TCPIP services v.5.1, may be a command released on newer versions.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 11:43:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-telnet-problem-with-many-concurrent-interactive/m-p/4192343#M89789</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maurizio Rondina</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-05-06T11:43:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OpenVms/Telnet problem with many concurrent interactive connections requests</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-telnet-problem-with-many-concurrent-interactive/m-p/4192344#M89790</link>
      <description>Steven, none error message are given...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;the terminal emulator's "connect box" of Power Term is browsed again after few minutes, without messages. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In this moment the telnet server normally respond and i cannot say you what happen and the error message, but i think the response is "impossible to open connection to the host".&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I try when the customer call me, in the moment there is the problem.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 11:53:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-telnet-problem-with-many-concurrent-interactive/m-p/4192344#M89790</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maurizio Rondina</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-05-06T11:53:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OpenVms/Telnet problem with many concurrent interactive connections requests</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-telnet-problem-with-many-concurrent-interactive/m-p/4192345#M89791</link>
      <description>Ok, if DNS was not reesponding you should get your connection within about 10 seconds (as far as I remember of my DNS play time).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Start tcpip and do help. Is tcptrace in there ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Wim</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 12:24:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-telnet-problem-with-many-concurrent-interactive/m-p/4192345#M89791</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wim Van den Wyngaert</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-05-06T12:24:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OpenVms/Telnet problem with many concurrent interactive connections requests</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-telnet-problem-with-many-concurrent-interactive/m-p/4192346#M89792</link>
      <description>Maurizio,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I would recommend that the problem be approached by looking carefully at real data, not by changing parameters that have been quite acceptable in the past. While it is quite possible that changes may be needed, it is far safer to make those changes based upon facts.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I would obtain an appropriate Ethernet HUB (not a switch). If managed switches are in use, then there are likely settings allowing traffic to be replicated.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I would then put a network analyzer  (e.g., WireShark; which is freeware and available for download) on the line between the OpenVMS system and the network infrastructure. When the problem occurs, it will then be possible to see precisely what is (and what is not) happening. Save the resulting trace file to disk for analysis.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Many things could be causing this problem. Not all of them involve the OpenVMS system. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Also if there is a shortage of internal expertise on looking at network traces, consider whether outside resources should be retained (disclosure: My firm provides such services, as do the firms affiliated with several other active contributors to ITRC).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;- Bob Gezelter, &lt;A href="http://www.rlgsc.com" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.rlgsc.com&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 12:27:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-telnet-problem-with-many-concurrent-interactive/m-p/4192346#M89792</guid>
      <dc:creator>Robert Gezelter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-05-06T12:27:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OpenVms/Telnet problem with many concurrent interactive connections requests</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-telnet-problem-with-many-concurrent-interactive/m-p/4192347#M89793</link>
      <description>Hello&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Do you get some data displayed at sys$output if you do&lt;BR /&gt;DEFINE TCPIP$SOCKET_TRACE 1 &lt;BR /&gt;telnet nodename&lt;BR /&gt;or telnet @ip&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you prefer to get the display in a file &lt;BR /&gt;DEFINE TCPIP$SOCKET_TRACE - SYS$LOGIN:TCPIP$SOCKET_TRACE.LOG &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;and after your telnet, look at the file&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 12:42:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-telnet-problem-with-many-concurrent-interactive/m-p/4192347#M89793</guid>
      <dc:creator>labadie_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-05-06T12:42:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OpenVms/Telnet problem with many concurrent interactive connections requests</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-telnet-problem-with-many-concurrent-interactive/m-p/4192348#M89794</link>
      <description>to Wim, the tcpiptrace isn't available on tcpip 5.1, i just verify this on tcpip help.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;when the problem happen, the waiting time is over than 10 seconds, may be over 1 minute, so i think the problem is due to a more complex network problem, as say Robert.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thank to Robert for the reccomendation, that i already generally use. Inside my customer are not internal expertise, that can analize network traces.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Unfortunately, i don't know the complete network infrastructure, the customer ask me to solve this problem as "ES40" problem, because is the only server that have the problem.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Now i'm working remotely on the problem, if necessary i must go on-site few days at 8,15am o'clock, when in few minutes, about 150-200 login are request and hope that the problem occurs in that moment. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For labadie, i try with your suggestion: none log file are created. I think, as i say above to Wim, that tcpip 5.1 doesn't support the trace feature.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;About the both suggestion of Wim and labadie, i think that the trace is needed on the client side, not on the ES40 side.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks to all.&lt;BR /&gt;  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 13:28:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-telnet-problem-with-many-concurrent-interactive/m-p/4192348#M89794</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maurizio Rondina</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-05-06T13:28:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OpenVms/Telnet problem with many concurrent interactive connections requests</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-telnet-problem-with-many-concurrent-interactive/m-p/4192349#M89795</link>
      <description>Maurizio,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;With all due respect, my suspicion is that a network trace (with a monitor, not TCPTRACE) at the server will illuminate what is happening.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Tracing at the client side will only show a single client's perspective. The aggregated trace near the server will show the conversations that are working, as well as those that are not.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I would also suggest ensuring that OpenVMS accounting is enabled, at least for the period of the surge.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;And yes, I have seen many problems reported as "server" problems that were actually problems with underlying infrastructure that were experienced as "server" problems.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;- Bob Gezelter, &lt;A href="http://www.rlgsc.com" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.rlgsc.com&lt;/A&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 13:47:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-telnet-problem-with-many-concurrent-interactive/m-p/4192349#M89795</guid>
      <dc:creator>Robert Gezelter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-05-06T13:47:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OpenVms/Telnet problem with many concurrent interactive connections requests</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-telnet-problem-with-many-concurrent-interactive/m-p/4192350#M89796</link>
      <description>tcptrace should be available according to documentation of 5.1. If not something is strange/wrong on your site.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Wim</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 13:53:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-telnet-problem-with-many-concurrent-interactive/m-p/4192350#M89796</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wim Van den Wyngaert</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-05-06T13:53:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OpenVms/Telnet problem with many concurrent interactive connections requests</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-telnet-problem-with-many-concurrent-interactive/m-p/4192351#M89797</link>
      <description>According to doc you must execute SYS$STARTUP:TCPIP$DEFINE_COMMANDS.COM first to get the command. That's not the case in 5.3 but you can try.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;There were also some DNS failover problems in some 5.1 versions. May be timeout was also handled differently (thus explaining the 1 min).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Wim</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 13:56:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-telnet-problem-with-many-concurrent-interactive/m-p/4192351#M89797</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wim Van den Wyngaert</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-05-06T13:56:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OpenVms/Telnet problem with many concurrent interactive connections requests</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-telnet-problem-with-many-concurrent-interactive/m-p/4192352#M89798</link>
      <description>Maurizio,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;consider to read the following article and see, if it applies to your situation:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://h18000.www1.hp.com/support/asktima/communications/CTI_SRC021219001467.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://h18000.www1.hp.com/support/asktima/communications/CTI_SRC021219001467.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Check for symptoms with&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;$ ANAL/SYS&lt;BR /&gt;SDA&amp;gt; tcpip sysconfig socket&lt;BR /&gt;...&lt;BR /&gt;SDA&amp;gt; EXIT&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What are the values for sobacklog_drops and &lt;BR /&gt;sobacklog_hiwat ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Volker.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 14:30:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-telnet-problem-with-many-concurrent-interactive/m-p/4192352#M89798</guid>
      <dc:creator>Volker Halle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-05-06T14:30:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OpenVms/Telnet problem with many concurrent interactive connections requests</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-telnet-problem-with-many-concurrent-interactive/m-p/4192353#M89799</link>
      <description>Wim, the TCPIP$DEFINE_COMMANDS.COM is already on my login.com, however i solve the problem of tcptrace, and now you can see the log on attachment: I trace the connection of the client 192.168.104.178 to the ES40 server 192.168.1.3, while it try to open a telnet connection. In that moment, with no problems, only few seconds wait.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Robert, i think that it's necessary my on-site visit to verify all points of view.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 15:06:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-telnet-problem-with-many-concurrent-interactive/m-p/4192353#M89799</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maurizio Rondina</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-05-06T15:06:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OpenVms/Telnet problem with many concurrent interactive connections requests</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-telnet-problem-with-many-concurrent-interactive/m-p/4192354#M89800</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I've only a little experience of VMS, but this statement stands out:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; The customer say me that the 192.168.1.9 &lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; server was replaced with 192.168.1.11 dns&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; server, a newer Windows 2003 Active&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; Directory DNS Server. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; They says that now the BIND/DNS server is &lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; not more necessary on the ES40. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I would ask your customer on what grounds they can make that decision, especially as it sounds like the server was still looking at the old resolver...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It would also be interesting to find out whether these problems started happening when the DNS server was changed.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Cheers,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Rob</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 15:47:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-telnet-problem-with-many-concurrent-interactive/m-p/4192354#M89800</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob Leadbeater</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-05-06T15:47:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OpenVms/Telnet problem with many concurrent interactive connections requests</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-telnet-problem-with-many-concurrent-interactive/m-p/4192355#M89801</link>
      <description>Volker, &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;the HP Article is very intresting (also if it concern with tcpip 5.3eco1, and not not tcpip5.1), i follow his suggestion, when the problem happen.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The strange is that, the days this happen, no problems there are for the logins of the first users, than at 8.15am in 5 minutes over 100 simultaneous login are requests. They, all wait for the Username prompt, but someone have reply in 2 minutes, others in 5 minutes, other even after 30 minutes. Then, all new connection requests, are normally satisfacted in one second. Seem there is a congest queue of connection requests.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For the sobacklog_drops and &lt;BR /&gt;sobacklog_hiwat values this is the actual (without problems) situation:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;sobacklog_drops 2058&lt;BR /&gt;soback_hiwat 8&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 16:08:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-telnet-problem-with-many-concurrent-interactive/m-p/4192355#M89801</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maurizio Rondina</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-05-06T16:08:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OpenVms/Telnet problem with many concurrent interactive connections requests</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-telnet-problem-with-many-concurrent-interactive/m-p/4192356#M89802</link>
      <description>Rob, &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Few years ago the customer make the decison to carry the DNS to Windows2003 server, and leave the one on the OpenVms system, because they believe that on this platform, the management was more simply, also for their internal techicians, and not need a OpenVms specialist (in this region of Italy, i'm the only, and there are only few systems).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;They realize the project, without consider the new OpenVms Dns role, and leave it as was.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;the 192.168.1.9 server, instead, was an older proxy server to which the OpenVms system (that only store the local names for local zone) ask for the forwarding requests, for public names resolving.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Also the 192.168.1.9 proxy server was substituted by one other (now 192.168.4.9) without consider the OpenVms system.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The problems, however, don't started happening with this changes.. sure not for the change of the proxy server, may be for a recently Dns configuration operation on the actual Dns on Windows 2003 server, that i don't know.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 16:38:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-telnet-problem-with-many-concurrent-interactive/m-p/4192356#M89802</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maurizio Rondina</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-05-06T16:38:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OpenVms/Telnet problem with many concurrent interactive connections requests</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-telnet-problem-with-many-concurrent-interactive/m-p/4192357#M89803</link>
      <description>Maurizio,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;if the 'problem' exists for the TELNET connections and it is the backlog queue problem, other IP protocols (e.g. FTP) should be fine. But even a $ TELNET localhost will hang. You can use these tests to easily rule out other speculations...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;From your data provided, it shows that you've hit this problem in the running system. Consider to watch the sobacklog_drops counter, if it increases during the time the problem is evident, it will confirm my analysis.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This is a very unusual scenario, but I've seen it before and HP service never found the problem, so I had to be called in.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Volker.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 05:08:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-telnet-problem-with-many-concurrent-interactive/m-p/4192357#M89803</guid>
      <dc:creator>Volker Halle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-05-07T05:08:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OpenVms/Telnet problem with many concurrent interactive connections requests</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-telnet-problem-with-many-concurrent-interactive/m-p/4192358#M89804</link>
      <description>Your trace starts at 17:42:41.79 and has nothing abnormal. If you should trace again, also trace the first name specified in the name server list.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;To add to Volkers solution : note that after a SYN drop the retransmit is done by the client after 5 seconds (surely some config item but could be hardcoded). And a timeout is 75 seconds.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Wim&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 05:52:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-telnet-problem-with-many-concurrent-interactive/m-p/4192358#M89804</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wim Van den Wyngaert</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-05-07T05:52:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OpenVms/Telnet problem with many concurrent interactive connections requests</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-telnet-problem-with-many-concurrent-interactive/m-p/4192359#M89805</link>
      <description>Vim and Volker,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;now I think I must wait the morning when the problem happen againg, and in that moment apply your suggestions, for more analysis.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 06:16:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-telnet-problem-with-many-concurrent-interactive/m-p/4192359#M89805</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maurizio Rondina</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-05-07T06:16:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

