<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ESL9000  tape drive problem in Operating System - OpenVMS</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/esl9000-tape-drive-problem/m-p/4269879#M91171</link>
    <description>Hi James,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is it possible that there are other hosts on the SAN that are accessing the library, which could be causing VMS to confused ??&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Cheers,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Rob</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:10:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Rob Leadbeater</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-09-23T19:10:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ESL9000  tape drive problem</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/esl9000-tape-drive-problem/m-p/4269875#M91167</link>
      <description>We are using 16 SDLT320 drives attached through NSR. We use MDMS and ABS for managing backup.&lt;BR /&gt;During the backup , the drives seemingly go offline due path disconnects and have to abort the batch job that runs the backup and restart. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1. The batch job issues a mount request for second volume&lt;BR /&gt;2. I mount a free volume through MDMS and reply to the request with mounted &lt;BR /&gt;3. Job keeps repeating the request &lt;BR /&gt;4. Log file  says "medium is offline " When I check the drive, it shows disconnected paths&lt;BR /&gt;Questions : &lt;BR /&gt;What am I doing wrong ?&lt;BR /&gt;Is it possible to set the path and not use multipath&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We are on VMS 8.3 on GS1280.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Please see the attached text file.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 03:34:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/esl9000-tape-drive-problem/m-p/4269875#M91167</guid>
      <dc:creator>James Viswasam</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-09-16T03:34:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ESL9000  tape drive problem</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/esl9000-tape-drive-problem/m-p/4269876#M91168</link>
      <description>I know nothing but found this in the 8.2 notes. Is your tape drive mscp served ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;failover between direct and MSCP-served paths is not supported for tape devices (unlike multipath failover between direct and MSCP-served paths for SCSI and Fibre Channel disks introduced in this release).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;fwiw&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Wim</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 05:44:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/esl9000-tape-drive-problem/m-p/4269876#M91168</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wim Van den Wyngaert</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-09-16T05:44:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ESL9000  tape drive problem</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/esl9000-tape-drive-problem/m-p/4269877#M91169</link>
      <description>Ignore that post. You don't have mscp.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bc/docs/support/SupportManual/c00775232/c00775232.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bc/docs/support/SupportManual/c00775232/c00775232.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;says that ETLA drives don't support mult-path failover (search for etla). That's in contrast with all docs saying that VMS can handle it starting from 7.3-1.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Confusing&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Wim</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 10:06:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/esl9000-tape-drive-problem/m-p/4269877#M91169</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wim Van den Wyngaert</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-09-16T10:06:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ESL9000  tape drive problem</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/esl9000-tape-drive-problem/m-p/4269878#M91170</link>
      <description>I am thinking of forcing the tape drive to use only one path by issuing the following command&lt;BR /&gt;set device/noenable/path=xyz device:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Would this work for tape device ? Are there any other issues that may crop up. Perhaps I can set this before starting the backup and then enable it after the backup is completed.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;( from VMS help )&lt;BR /&gt;SET&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;  DEVICE&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;    /ENABLE&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;          /ENABLE&lt;BR /&gt;          /NOENABLE&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;       Enables or disables a path to a multipath device; the affected&lt;BR /&gt;       path is the one named in the /PATH qualifier. All paths are&lt;BR /&gt;       initially enabled; the current path cannot be disabled.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 18:36:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/esl9000-tape-drive-problem/m-p/4269878#M91170</guid>
      <dc:creator>James Viswasam</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-09-23T18:36:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ESL9000  tape drive problem</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/esl9000-tape-drive-problem/m-p/4269879#M91171</link>
      <description>Hi James,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is it possible that there are other hosts on the SAN that are accessing the library, which could be causing VMS to confused ??&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Cheers,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Rob</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:10:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/esl9000-tape-drive-problem/m-p/4269879#M91171</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob Leadbeater</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-09-23T19:10:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

