<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: HBMM   %SYSTEM-F-SHADFEATNOMNT, in Operating System - OpenVMS</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/hbmm-system-f-shadfeatnomnt/m-p/4596138#M98023</link>
    <description>OK - looked back a little more closely. Have seen the issue twice in the last month. In both cases the first node was starting to boot, and in SYPAGSWPFILES.COM. The second node had not yet started to boot - was still at &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; prompt.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;--&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Then this makes no sense, because what you effectively have is a one-node cluster.  For grins, how 'bout placing a $ SHOW CLUSTER command before attempting to enable HBMM.  It almost seems like there is a rogue node hanging around that is voting to prevent the use of HBMM.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Some background -- in order for "enhanced shadowing features" to be used, there is vote taken of all known shadowing drivers in the cluster.  The lock manager is used to conduct this poll, and it's something that we spent a lot of time making sure that we got right.  I don't remember the exact details (it was almost seven(!) years ago that we did this), but it was designed in such a way that a shadowing driver that had no knowledge of this locking protocol would wind up implicitly withholding their vote, making the ballot measure fail (the only way the votes "passes" is if all nodes in the cluster vote "yes".  Any abstention or explicit "no" causes the vote to fail.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It's *possible* that some modifications were added after the initial release such that a newer UPDATE kit would help . . .&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;-- Rob</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:57:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Robert Brooks_1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-03-09T16:57:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>HBMM   %SYSTEM-F-SHADFEATNOMNT,</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/hbmm-system-f-shadfeatnomnt/m-p/4596130#M98015</link>
      <description>Hello&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;On a VMS V7.3-2 Alpha cluster, the SYPAGSWPFILES.COM contains&lt;BR /&gt;    Set Shadow/Enable=HBMM Sys$Sysdevice:&lt;BR /&gt;after a complete cluster shutdown, the first node to reboot executes this command and gives:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;%SYSTEM-F-SHADFEATNOMNT, device not mounted on system that supports requested Shadowing feature&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;HELP/MESSAGE does not seem to know about this error.   Any ideas?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;No obvious actual adverse impact on the system, other than the error message.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 20:05:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/hbmm-system-f-shadfeatnomnt/m-p/4596130#M98015</guid>
      <dc:creator>Benjamin Levy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-06T20:05:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HBMM   %SYSTEM-F-SHADFEATNOMNT,</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/hbmm-system-f-shadfeatnomnt/m-p/4596131#M98016</link>
      <description>&lt;!--!*#--&gt;I know nothing, but around here:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;alp $ help /mess SHADFEATNOMNT&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; SHADFEATNOMNT,  device not mounted on system that supports requested&lt;BR /&gt;                 shadowing feature&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;  Facility:     SET, SET Command and SET Utility&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;  Explanation:  You tried to enable an enhanced shadowing feature on the&lt;BR /&gt;                specified shadow set, but the shadow set is mounted on at&lt;BR /&gt;                least one system in the cluster that does not support that&lt;BR /&gt;                feature.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;  User Action:  Dismount the shadow set on the system that does not support&lt;BR /&gt;                the requested enhanced shadowing feature; then try the&lt;BR /&gt;                operation again.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;alp $ write sys$output "''f$getsyi( "version")' ''f$getsyi( "arch_name")'"&lt;BR /&gt;V8.3     Alpha&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What's mounted where?&lt;BR /&gt;      SHOW DEVICE D</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 20:16:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/hbmm-system-f-shadfeatnomnt/m-p/4596131#M98016</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven Schweda</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-06T20:16:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HBMM   %SYSTEM-F-SHADFEATNOMNT,</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/hbmm-system-f-shadfeatnomnt/m-p/4596132#M98017</link>
      <description>We'll need a bit more detail, like what is the policy that's in use.  Is there a default policy defined for the cluster?  If so, are you sure that it's defined before this attempt at using HBMM?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;                -- Rob</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 00:46:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/hbmm-system-f-shadfeatnomnt/m-p/4596132#M98017</guid>
      <dc:creator>Robert Brooks_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-07T00:46:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HBMM   %SYSTEM-F-SHADFEATNOMNT,</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/hbmm-system-f-shadfeatnomnt/m-p/4596133#M98018</link>
      <description>The command immediately proceeding the attempt to enable HBMM on the system disk is:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;$ Set Shadow/Name=Default -&lt;BR /&gt;     /Policy=HBMM=((MASTER_LIST=(*)),RESET_THRESHOLD=50000)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I think this may be due to the 2nd node booting into the cluster being not very far behind the 1st node.   Possibly the 2nd node is far along enough in the boot for the shadow driver to count it as a node, but not far enough for the shadow driver to enable HBMM on that other node??</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 01:16:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/hbmm-system-f-shadfeatnomnt/m-p/4596133#M98018</guid>
      <dc:creator>Benjamin Levy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-08T01:16:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HBMM   %SYSTEM-F-SHADFEATNOMNT,</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/hbmm-system-f-shadfeatnomnt/m-p/4596134#M98019</link>
      <description>Possibly the 2nd node is far along enough in the boot for the shadow driver to count it as a node, but not far enough for the shadow driver to enable HBMM on that other node??&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;-- &lt;BR /&gt;That's a possibility, although I'll need to think about this a bit.  The SHADOW_SERVER process is required for ANY shadow set to be mounted, even if HBMM isn't used.  Thus, it's hard to imagine (but not impossible) a window where enough of the system was running to allow the mounting of the shadowed system disk&lt;BR /&gt;on the 2nd node, but yet not enough to have&lt;BR /&gt;gone through the locking protocol to allow it to run any of the enhanced features (HBMM or dissimilar device shadowing).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;-- Rob</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 03:37:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/hbmm-system-f-shadfeatnomnt/m-p/4596134#M98019</guid>
      <dc:creator>Robert Brooks_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-08T03:37:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HBMM   %SYSTEM-F-SHADFEATNOMNT,</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/hbmm-system-f-shadfeatnomnt/m-p/4596135#M98020</link>
      <description>OK - looked back a little more closely.   Have seen the issue twice in the last month.   In both cases the first node was starting to boot, and in SYPAGSWPFILES.COM.   The second node had not yet started to boot - was still at &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; prompt.   The second node did start to boot a little later - before the first node had finished booting - but well after the suspicious shadow driver message.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:15:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/hbmm-system-f-shadfeatnomnt/m-p/4596135#M98020</guid>
      <dc:creator>Benjamin Levy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-09T05:15:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HBMM   %SYSTEM-F-SHADFEATNOMNT,</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/hbmm-system-f-shadfeatnomnt/m-p/4596136#M98021</link>
      <description>Are both nodes booting from the same system disk and what shadowing patches do you have installed?</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 10:12:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/hbmm-system-f-shadfeatnomnt/m-p/4596136#M98021</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ian Miller.</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-09T10:12:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HBMM   %SYSTEM-F-SHADFEATNOMNT,</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/hbmm-system-f-shadfeatnomnt/m-p/4596137#M98022</link>
      <description>both nodes on the same system disk&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;PROD SHOW HISTORY show the last major round of patches was done in 2004.   (I know - a long time ago.)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS VMS732_SYS V7.0           Patch       Install         10-JUN-2005&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS VMS732_RMS V2.0           Patch       Install         09-MAR-2005&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS VMS732_VMSMUP V1.0        Patch       Install         08-MAR-2005&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS VMS732_DRIVER V1.0        Patch       Install         08-MAR-2005&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS VMS732_LINKER V1.0        Patch       Install         08-MAR-2005&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS TCPIP_ECO V5.4-154        Patch       Install         08-MAR-2005&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS VMS732_SYSINI V1.0        Patch       Install         08-MAR-2005&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS VMS732_FIBRE_SCSI V4.0    Patch       Install         08-DEC-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS VMS732_SYS V6.0           Patch       Install         08-DEC-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS VMS732_TRACE V2.0         Patch       Install         01-DEC-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS VMS732_UPDATE V3.0        Patch       Install         01-DEC-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS VMS732_F11X V3.0          Patch       Install         19-OCT-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS DNVOSIECO01 V7.3-2        Patch       Install         13-OCT-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS VMS732_HBMM V2.0          Patch       Install         12-OCT-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS VMS732_BACKUP V2.0        Patch       Install         12-OCT-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS VMS732_IPC V1.0           Patch       Install         12-OCT-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS VMS732_AUDSRV V1.0        Patch       Install         12-OCT-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS VMS732_TRACE V1.0         Patch       Install         12-OCT-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS VMS732_F11X V2.0          Patch       Install         12-OCT-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS VMS732_XFC V1.0           Patch       Install         12-OCT-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS VMS732_RPC V3.0           Patch       Install         12-OCT-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS VMS732_SYS V5.0           Patch       Install         25-AUG-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS VMS732_BACKUP V1.0        Patch       Install         25-AUG-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS VMS732_RMS V1.0           Patch       Install         20-AUG-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS VMS732_PTHREAD V1.0       Patch       Install         20-AUG-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS VMS732_MOUNT96 V1.0       Patch       Install         20-AUG-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS VMS732_SYS V4.0           Patch       Install         22-JUL-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS VMS732_SYSLOA V2.0        Patch       Install         22-JUL-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS VMS732_LIBRTL V1.0        Patch       Install         22-JUL-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS VMS732_TDF V2.0           Patch       Install         22-JUL-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS DCE V3.1                  Full LP     Install         21-JUL-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS DCE V3.0                  Full LP     Remove          21-JUL-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS DCE030U01 V1.0            Patch (MUP) Remove          21-JUL-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS VMS732_MANAGE V2.0        Patch       Install         19-JUL-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS VMS732_DCL V2.0           Patch       Install         19-JUL-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS VMS732_UPDATE V2.0        Patch       Install         19-JUL-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS VMS732_SHADOWING V1.0     Patch       Install         19-JUL-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS VMS732_SYS V3.0           Patch       Install         19-JUL-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS VMS732_FIBRE_SCSI V3.0    Patch       Install         19-JUL-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS TCPIP_ECO V5.4-152        Patch       Install         16-JUL-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS VMS732_F11X V1.0          Patch       Install         05-APR-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS TCPIP_ECO V5.4-151        Patch       Install         30-MAR-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS VMS732_FIBRE_SCSI V1.0    Patch       Install         26-MAR-2004&lt;BR /&gt;CPQ AXPVMS CPQSNVIEW V2.0-3          Full LP     Install         25-MAR-2004&lt;BR /&gt;CPQ AXPVMS CPQSNVIEW V2.0-1          Full LP     Remove          25-MAR-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS VMS732_LAN V1.0           Patch       Install         25-MAR-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS FORTRAN V7.6-1            Full LP     Install         23-MAR-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS FORTECO V7.5-2630         Patch       Remove          23-MAR-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS FORTRAN V7.5-1            Full LP     Remove          23-MAR-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS FORRTL V7.6-1             Full LP     Install         23-MAR-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS FORRTL V7.5-1             Full LP     Remove          23-MAR-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC VMS AVAIL_MAN V2.3-1             Full LP     Install         22-MAR-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC VMS AVAIL_MAN V2.3               Full LP     Remove          22-MAR-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS VMS732_SYS V2.0           Patch       Install         22-MAR-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS VMS732_SYS V1.0           Patch       Install         22-MAR-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS VMS732_MANAGE V1.0        Patch       Install         16-MAR-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS COBOL V2.8-1286           Full LP     Install         11-MAR-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS COBOL V2.7-1262           Full LP     Remove          11-MAR-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS COBRTL V2.8-670B          Full LP     Install         11-MAR-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS COBRTL V2.7-641B          Full LP     Remove          11-MAR-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS VMS732_PCSI V1.0          Patch       Install         10-MAR-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS VMS732_UPDATE V1.0        Patch       Install         10-MAR-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS VMS732_GRAPHICS V2.0      Patch       Install         10-MAR-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS VMS732_RPC V1.0           Patch       Install         10-MAR-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS VMS732_DCL V1.0           Patch       Install         10-MAR-2004&lt;BR /&gt;CPQ AXPVMS CDSA V2.0-109             Full LP     Install         08-MAR-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS DECNET_OSI V7.3-2         Full LP     Install         08-MAR-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS DWMOTIF V1.3-1            Full LP     Install         08-MAR-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS OPENVMS V7.3-2            Platform    Install         08-MAR-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS TCPIP V5.4-15             Full LP     Install         08-MAR-2004&lt;BR /&gt;DEC AXPVMS VMS V7.3-2                Oper System Install         08-MAR-2004&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 15:55:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/hbmm-system-f-shadfeatnomnt/m-p/4596137#M98022</guid>
      <dc:creator>Benjamin Levy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-09T15:55:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HBMM   %SYSTEM-F-SHADFEATNOMNT,</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/hbmm-system-f-shadfeatnomnt/m-p/4596138#M98023</link>
      <description>OK - looked back a little more closely. Have seen the issue twice in the last month. In both cases the first node was starting to boot, and in SYPAGSWPFILES.COM. The second node had not yet started to boot - was still at &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; prompt.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;--&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Then this makes no sense, because what you effectively have is a one-node cluster.  For grins, how 'bout placing a $ SHOW CLUSTER command before attempting to enable HBMM.  It almost seems like there is a rogue node hanging around that is voting to prevent the use of HBMM.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Some background -- in order for "enhanced shadowing features" to be used, there is vote taken of all known shadowing drivers in the cluster.  The lock manager is used to conduct this poll, and it's something that we spent a lot of time making sure that we got right.  I don't remember the exact details (it was almost seven(!) years ago that we did this), but it was designed in such a way that a shadowing driver that had no knowledge of this locking protocol would wind up implicitly withholding their vote, making the ballot measure fail (the only way the votes "passes" is if all nodes in the cluster vote "yes".  Any abstention or explicit "no" causes the vote to fail.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It's *possible* that some modifications were added after the initial release such that a newer UPDATE kit would help . . .&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;-- Rob</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:57:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/hbmm-system-f-shadfeatnomnt/m-p/4596138#M98023</guid>
      <dc:creator>Robert Brooks_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-09T16:57:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HBMM   %SYSTEM-F-SHADFEATNOMNT,</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/hbmm-system-f-shadfeatnomnt/m-p/4596139#M98024</link>
      <description>What sort of device and what sort of interconnect?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What is the general cluster configuration here?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What's happening that you're rebooting the boxes like this?  Backups? &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;How are the boxes being shut down?  Direct console HALT, or a controlled shutdown followed by a console HALT?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Issue a SHOW DEVICE SYS$SYSDEVICE /FULL in addition to the SHOW CLUSTER command that Robert suggests, too.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For grins and giggles, I'd stick a WAIT 00:00:05 into the startup between the SET SHADOW and the MOUNT commands, too.  This on the off (and wild) chance that HBVS is getting its knickers tangled if the SET SHADOW happens to blocks the MOUNT for some reason.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Yes, loading a newer UPDATE might be an auspicious approach.  Six years is a long time.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:25:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/hbmm-system-f-shadfeatnomnt/m-p/4596139#M98024</guid>
      <dc:creator>Hoff</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-09T17:25:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HBMM   %SYSTEM-F-SHADFEATNOMNT,</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/hbmm-system-f-shadfeatnomnt/m-p/4596140#M98025</link>
      <description>OK - this is a cluster with crossover ethernet cables - pretty straightforward there.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Based on the responses, I added the "SHOW CLUSTER" and the 5-second wait in SYPAGSWPFILES.COM - "SHOW CLUSTER" first, then the 5-second wait.   Will monitor the situation and see if any change or interesting output.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks for the ideas.   Will keep this thread updated if more info.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 02:26:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/hbmm-system-f-shadfeatnomnt/m-p/4596140#M98025</guid>
      <dc:creator>Benjamin Levy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-10T02:26:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HBMM   %SYSTEM-F-SHADFEATNOMNT,</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/hbmm-system-f-shadfeatnomnt/m-p/4596141#M98026</link>
      <description>OK - this is a cluster with crossover ethernet cables - pretty straightforward there.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Based on the responses, I added the "SHOW CLUSTER" and the 5-second wait in SYPAGSWPFILES.COM - "SHOW CLUSTER" first, then the 5-second wait. Will monitor the situation and see if any change or interesting output.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;--&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The five second delay may mask the problem, but make no mistake -- something is quite wrong here, and it's likely in the shadowing code -- either in SHDRIVER itself or the SHADOW_SERVER process.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;There were five engineers who worked on the HBMM project; only two of us remain at HP now, and neither one of us is still in VMS Engineering.  I conferred with the other remaining engineer, after pointing him to this thread, and he didn't have any other suggestions, other than to remind me that the shadowing driver does have some system disk-specific code that is not exercised for data disks, and it's possible that there is a latent bug, even though we did have an exhaustive list of test cases that involved system disks and HBMM.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'd suggest contacting HP and opening a call (assuming you have prior version support), but even if you do, the first suggestion will be to upgrade to a more current UPDATE kit.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;-- Rob</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:33:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/hbmm-system-f-shadfeatnomnt/m-p/4596141#M98026</guid>
      <dc:creator>Robert Brooks_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-11T05:33:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

