<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: iLO 3 shared network port - downsides? in Server Management - Remote Server Management</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/server-management-remote-server/ilo-3-shared-network-port-downsides/m-p/4764520#M5766</link>
    <description>Thanks Michael - that's useful to know. I suppose HP SIM, which needs to run somewhere, is a good example of where it would be a problem. I wonder if would still be a problem if the server was using bonded ports (assuming they are active-active)... (I suppose the NIC1 is alternated between iLO and server, rather than really being an ethernet switch).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I also wonder whether the brief interruption in NIC1 might upset some network monitoring etc.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Anyone got this arrangement running in production?</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2011 13:24:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Simon Haslam</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-03-13T13:24:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>iLO 3 shared network port - downsides?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/server-management-remote-server/ilo-3-shared-network-port-downsides/m-p/4764518#M5764</link>
      <description>Hi&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As a long-term user of iLO I've always plugged the dedicated iLO port into some sort of management network. However I am now wondering whether I can simplify rack cabling by using the shared network feature introduced a couple of years or so ago.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Looking at docs this appears to be implemented as some sort of "mini switch" on NIC 1.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So, let's say for the main server (say, DL380 running VMware ESXi 4.1) I had a bonded pair between NIC1 and another NIC (other onboard controller or separate card), then I would share NIC 1 with iLO. Then I would presumably have the server itself on one VLAN and the iLO on a management VLAN.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Are there any problems with this proposal? I can't see any obvious downsides mentioned in the user guide (&lt;A href="http://bizsupport1.austin.hp.com/bc/docs/support/SupportManual/c02063196/c02063196.pdf)" target="_blank"&gt;http://bizsupport1.austin.hp.com/bc/docs/support/SupportManual/c02063196/c02063196.pdf)&lt;/A&gt; or best practices (&lt;A href="http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bc/docs/support/SupportManual/c00257375/c00257375.pdf)." target="_blank"&gt;http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bc/docs/support/SupportManual/c00257375/c00257375.pdf).&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I can imagine there would be a small sacrifice in server bandwidth on NIC1 when iLO was in use (especially remote console or media) but presumably that wouldn't be much or often.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Any suggestions?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Simon&lt;BR /&gt;PS. I won't forget to award points ;)</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2011 11:17:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/server-management-remote-server/ilo-3-shared-network-port-downsides/m-p/4764518#M5764</guid>
      <dc:creator>Simon Haslam</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-13T11:17:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: iLO 3 shared network port - downsides?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/server-management-remote-server/ilo-3-shared-network-port-downsides/m-p/4764519#M5765</link>
      <description>One limitation seems to be a server can't connect to its own iLO in shared mode:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://forums.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?threadId=1464790" target="_blank"&gt;http://forums.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?threadId=1464790&lt;/A&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2011 12:52:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/server-management-remote-server/ilo-3-shared-network-port-downsides/m-p/4764519#M5765</guid>
      <dc:creator>Michael Leu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-13T12:52:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: iLO 3 shared network port - downsides?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/server-management-remote-server/ilo-3-shared-network-port-downsides/m-p/4764520#M5766</link>
      <description>Thanks Michael - that's useful to know. I suppose HP SIM, which needs to run somewhere, is a good example of where it would be a problem. I wonder if would still be a problem if the server was using bonded ports (assuming they are active-active)... (I suppose the NIC1 is alternated between iLO and server, rather than really being an ethernet switch).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I also wonder whether the brief interruption in NIC1 might upset some network monitoring etc.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Anyone got this arrangement running in production?</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2011 13:24:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/server-management-remote-server/ilo-3-shared-network-port-downsides/m-p/4764520#M5766</guid>
      <dc:creator>Simon Haslam</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-13T13:24:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

