<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Predictive Drive Failure in Insight Remote Support</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/insight-remote-support/predictive-drive-failure/m-p/5320091#M4256</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i saw the same behavior on our systems.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Predictive failed drives did not produce a case.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could this behavior be changed ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is the reason that no case will be produced ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for any hints&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 07:08:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Leo Plewa</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-09-02T07:08:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Predictive Drive Failure</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/insight-remote-support/predictive-drive-failure/m-p/5295479#M4233</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm using WBEM on some servers. On one of them, I have noticed it sent SIM an indication that one drive was in a state of predictive failure. Should this produce and auto support call via IRS/WEBES? i.e. should predictive drive failures trigger a call at the HP backend?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 15:00:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/insight-remote-support/predictive-drive-failure/m-p/5295479#M4233</guid>
      <dc:creator>shocko</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-08-09T15:00:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Predictive Drive Failure</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/insight-remote-support/predictive-drive-failure/m-p/5320091#M4256</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i saw the same behavior on our systems.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Predictive failed drives did not produce a case.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could this behavior be changed ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is the reason that no case will be produced ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for any hints&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 07:08:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/insight-remote-support/predictive-drive-failure/m-p/5320091#M4256</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leo Plewa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-09-02T07:08:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Predictive Drive Failure</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/insight-remote-support/predictive-drive-failure/m-p/5320843#M4257</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Was this Windows or HPUX for the system that reported the failure?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You need to ensure that there is a WEBES subscription in place also. This will be pointed back to the SIM server on port 7906.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When you look at WEBES is it a valid entity “not orange in color”?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does it have a valid WBEM protocol listed, site, contact and entitlement filled out properly?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If all this is OK we should have seen something in the WEBES list of events. There's an outside chance that this was a non-actionable events but if the drive failed I would think this was not the case. You might try sending some test events through to ensure WEBES and the RSC client for RSA is working correctly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards brad&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 21:02:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/insight-remote-support/predictive-drive-failure/m-p/5320843#M4257</guid>
      <dc:creator>Brad Cunningham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-09-02T21:02:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Predictive Drive Failure</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/insight-remote-support/predictive-drive-failure/m-p/5321817#M4259</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;For me i saw this problem on windows 2003 servers with PSP 8.60 and linux servers with RH5 and PSP 8.70.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All servers are using SNMP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SNMP test traps are always received.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In case of a predictive failed disk i did not receive an SNMP Trap and so no&amp;nbsp;case is created.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For full defective HDDs traps and cases are generated.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 07:38:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/insight-remote-support/predictive-drive-failure/m-p/5321817#M4259</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leo Plewa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-09-05T07:38:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Predictive Drive Failure</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/insight-remote-support/predictive-drive-failure/m-p/5321941#M4260</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've figured this one out. The answer is YES, predictive drive failures should generate support calls. The problem I had was that webes was not subscribed to SIM and so wasn't analyzing WBEM events received from systems when a predictive failure was detected. Created a subscription to SIM WMI mapped from webes and now auto supports are generated when webes analyses the WBEM events sent to SIM.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 09:35:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/insight-remote-support/predictive-drive-failure/m-p/5321941#M4260</guid>
      <dc:creator>shocko</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-09-05T09:35:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

