<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Issues with SNMP Forwarding in Server Management - Systems Insight Manager</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/server-management-systems/issues-with-snmp-forwarding/m-p/3533642#M11588</link>
    <description>Hi I have due to security reasons two SIM managers. One on a dark side of a network and the second on the good side (Star Wars fans chuckles expected!!). When I forward alarms from one manager to another I get the manager name in the name field and not the name of the machine in error. Is this a simple case of putting variables into the string to show the original name or am I just missing something. This second system is linked to the paging system and the text is the body of the message hence the need for the original machine name.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards&lt;BR /&gt;Ray</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2005 22:12:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ray Sutton_5</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-04-27T22:12:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Issues with SNMP Forwarding</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/server-management-systems/issues-with-snmp-forwarding/m-p/3533642#M11588</link>
      <description>Hi I have due to security reasons two SIM managers. One on a dark side of a network and the second on the good side (Star Wars fans chuckles expected!!). When I forward alarms from one manager to another I get the manager name in the name field and not the name of the machine in error. Is this a simple case of putting variables into the string to show the original name or am I just missing something. This second system is linked to the paging system and the text is the body of the message hence the need for the original machine name.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards&lt;BR /&gt;Ray</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2005 22:12:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/server-management-systems/issues-with-snmp-forwarding/m-p/3533642#M11588</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ray Sutton_5</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-27T22:12:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Issues with SNMP Forwarding</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/server-management-systems/issues-with-snmp-forwarding/m-p/3533643#M11589</link>
      <description>It sounds likely that your second system does not have the same hosts being monitored as the first system.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I personally haven't seen this in HPSIM 4.x but ran into this when testing with the old CIM32 and IM7.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you forward a trap from a system into SIM and the receiving SIM does not have the machine in error defined, it will send the alert as if the forwarding system was the one in error.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Good luck.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2005 23:42:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/server-management-systems/issues-with-snmp-forwarding/m-p/3533643#M11589</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kevin_130</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-27T23:42:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Issues with SNMP Forwarding</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/server-management-systems/issues-with-snmp-forwarding/m-p/3533644#M11590</link>
      <description>Hi Kevin,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks for the reply. Does this mean I have to provide a lookup table for the host addresses. I dont monitor these workstations/servers from the second box but have to use this (due to security) to provide the paging facility. Can I overcome this anyway by example creating a host lookup on the secondary box?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Many thanks&lt;BR /&gt;Ray</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2005 23:48:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/server-management-systems/issues-with-snmp-forwarding/m-p/3533644#M11590</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ray Sutton_5</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-27T23:48:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Issues with SNMP Forwarding</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/server-management-systems/issues-with-snmp-forwarding/m-p/3533645#M11591</link>
      <description>I suppose if you did a manual discovery with a hosts file to add all your "invisible" systems that should work. On the downside, you would now see a bunch of servers in a perpetual Critical condition.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 00:10:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/server-management-systems/issues-with-snmp-forwarding/m-p/3533645#M11591</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kevin_130</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-28T00:10:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Issues with SNMP Forwarding</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/server-management-systems/issues-with-snmp-forwarding/m-p/3533646#M11592</link>
      <description>But surely the machine name would be embedded into the message text. Like NNM is their not a way that I can extract that information and put this into the message text? thats all I want to do. I think you can do this in previous versions of CIM but it doesnt appear to be easy on SIM? Am I wrong in this or have we lost functionality here?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards&lt;BR /&gt;Ray</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 00:27:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/server-management-systems/issues-with-snmp-forwarding/m-p/3533646#M11592</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ray Sutton_5</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-28T00:27:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

