<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic More MIB/OID related really... and aimed at HP programmers in Server Management - Systems Insight Manager</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/server-management-systems/more-mib-oid-related-really-and-aimed-at-hp-programmers/m-p/4059786#M29003</link>
    <description>I use MRTG to monitor and graph server CPU and ambient temperatures as we have a history of various heat related issues at one of our sites.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Until recently I've used the OID .1.3.6.1.4.1.232.6.2.6.8.1.3.0.2 to query the ambient temperature, however we recently bought a DL320 G5 running Support Pack 7.80A, and this apparently uses the OID .1.3.6.1.4.1.232.6.2.6.8.1.3.0.4 for ambient temperature... A recently purchased DL380 G5 also running Support Pack 7.80A uses the original OID, so the change seems only to be applicable to the DL320.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is this change a blip/mistake ? It'd be REALLY helpful if HP could stick to consistent OIDs ;)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks in advance,&lt;BR /&gt;Sam</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 07:43:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>samuel_34</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-08-24T07:43:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>More MIB/OID related really... and aimed at HP programmers</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/server-management-systems/more-mib-oid-related-really-and-aimed-at-hp-programmers/m-p/4059786#M29003</link>
      <description>I use MRTG to monitor and graph server CPU and ambient temperatures as we have a history of various heat related issues at one of our sites.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Until recently I've used the OID .1.3.6.1.4.1.232.6.2.6.8.1.3.0.2 to query the ambient temperature, however we recently bought a DL320 G5 running Support Pack 7.80A, and this apparently uses the OID .1.3.6.1.4.1.232.6.2.6.8.1.3.0.4 for ambient temperature... A recently purchased DL380 G5 also running Support Pack 7.80A uses the original OID, so the change seems only to be applicable to the DL320.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is this change a blip/mistake ? It'd be REALLY helpful if HP could stick to consistent OIDs ;)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks in advance,&lt;BR /&gt;Sam</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 07:43:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/server-management-systems/more-mib-oid-related-really-and-aimed-at-hp-programmers/m-p/4059786#M29003</guid>
      <dc:creator>samuel_34</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-24T07:43:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: More MIB/OID related really... and aimed at HP programmers</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/server-management-systems/more-mib-oid-related-really-and-aimed-at-hp-programmers/m-p/4059787#M29004</link>
      <description>Actually, prior to the G5 (not including the 320) series and the c-Class, there is NOT an ambient temperature sensor on ProLiant servers.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 09:29:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/server-management-systems/more-mib-oid-related-really-and-aimed-at-hp-programmers/m-p/4059787#M29004</guid>
      <dc:creator>David Claypool</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-24T09:29:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: More MIB/OID related really... and aimed at HP programmers</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/server-management-systems/more-mib-oid-related-really-and-aimed-at-hp-programmers/m-p/4059788#M29005</link>
      <description>Hi David,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Yes, I know, and its inclusion is very useful - a big thanks for that :)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The comment is about consistency really.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;When coding MRTG I cut and paste sections into the config file, however I'm now having to check that the OID I'm used to does actually refer to the same attribute. Its a minor point, but a pain in the butt all the same.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks for getting back to me btw - appreciated .&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;All the best,&lt;BR /&gt;Sam&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 10:21:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/server-management-systems/more-mib-oid-related-really-and-aimed-at-hp-programmers/m-p/4059788#M29005</guid>
      <dc:creator>samuel_34</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-24T10:21:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

