<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic HP SIM for HPC cluster in Server Management - Systems Insight Manager</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/server-management-systems/hp-sim-for-hpc-cluster/m-p/4593393#M40288</link>
    <description>What do you think, is it good practise use SIM for hpc computing cluster? I need to have compute nodes hw monitoring. So I am thinking to install hpasm on each compute node which will inform SIM if something will goes wrong with compute nodes hw. But maybe better way use only LO100 for monitoring hw?</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 16:29:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>bgm.jonas</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-03-02T16:29:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>HP SIM for HPC cluster</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/server-management-systems/hp-sim-for-hpc-cluster/m-p/4593393#M40288</link>
      <description>What do you think, is it good practise use SIM for hpc computing cluster? I need to have compute nodes hw monitoring. So I am thinking to install hpasm on each compute node which will inform SIM if something will goes wrong with compute nodes hw. But maybe better way use only LO100 for monitoring hw?</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 16:29:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/server-management-systems/hp-sim-for-hpc-cluster/m-p/4593393#M40288</guid>
      <dc:creator>bgm.jonas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-02T16:29:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

