<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic PMP and SAN in Server Management - Systems Insight Manager</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/server-management-systems/pmp-and-san/m-p/3353151#M5031</link>
    <description>For servers with access to multiple SAN's, when licensing one server, could only see one of the SAN's. Licensing a second server allowed access to another SAN. Is this normal behaviour or should licensing one server allow PMP access to all SAN's connected to it?</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 04:59:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Brian Loxton</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2004-08-10T04:59:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PMP and SAN</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/server-management-systems/pmp-and-san/m-p/3353151#M5031</link>
      <description>For servers with access to multiple SAN's, when licensing one server, could only see one of the SAN's. Licensing a second server allowed access to another SAN. Is this normal behaviour or should licensing one server allow PMP access to all SAN's connected to it?</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 04:59:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/server-management-systems/pmp-and-san/m-p/3353151#M5031</guid>
      <dc:creator>Brian Loxton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-08-10T04:59:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

