<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Spanning on a CV-Flex10 in BladeSystem - General</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/spanning-on-a-cv-flex10/m-p/4641316#M10405</link>
    <description>Indeed, the VC Flex-10 I/O module will not switch traffic between uplink ports.  You would have to send the traffic to a blade via one of the downlink ports and have the blade bridge/route the traffic out a second downlink port in another vnet and up through the second uplink port.  Your option 2 I believe.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;At that point though what you are measuring is as much the blade as it is the module.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;(Uplink port - the ports on the front panel of the I/O module.  Downlink port - the "internal" ports that go to the blades themselves)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As for setting up a mirror, that could in theory avoid actually measuring the blade more than the module, but while I don't know one way or the other, you should probably assume that path is not a "primary" performance path, which again calls into question whether you can draw conclusions about "normal operation" from it.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So, to what end do you want to conduct these tests?  To verify what is claimed in the quickspecs:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://h18004.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/13127_na/13127_na.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://h18004.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/13127_na/13127_na.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;or is there something else you want to see that isn't discussed there?</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 00:04:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rick jones</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-06-03T00:04:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Spanning on a CV-Flex10</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/spanning-on-a-cv-flex10/m-p/4641315#M10404</link>
      <description>Hi All&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am trying to test the 10Gig capability of the VC-Flex 10 module.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Has any one found an easy way to span an external connection to another external port ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What I want to do is connect a tester (ixia or spirent whatever) to an external port and have all the traffic come out on another external port.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As far as I know you can't map external ports to one another, which has left me with 2 solutions:&lt;BR /&gt;1. Send the traffic to a server and use the Span functionality to mirror the data to an external port&lt;BR /&gt;2. send the traffic to a server and use a bridge link on a Microsoft server and map the output of the server to another external link.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Does any one have any ideas to help me out ?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 12:16:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/spanning-on-a-cv-flex10/m-p/4641315#M10404</guid>
      <dc:creator>David Mesquita</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-02T12:16:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Spanning on a CV-Flex10</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/spanning-on-a-cv-flex10/m-p/4641316#M10405</link>
      <description>Indeed, the VC Flex-10 I/O module will not switch traffic between uplink ports.  You would have to send the traffic to a blade via one of the downlink ports and have the blade bridge/route the traffic out a second downlink port in another vnet and up through the second uplink port.  Your option 2 I believe.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;At that point though what you are measuring is as much the blade as it is the module.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;(Uplink port - the ports on the front panel of the I/O module.  Downlink port - the "internal" ports that go to the blades themselves)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As for setting up a mirror, that could in theory avoid actually measuring the blade more than the module, but while I don't know one way or the other, you should probably assume that path is not a "primary" performance path, which again calls into question whether you can draw conclusions about "normal operation" from it.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So, to what end do you want to conduct these tests?  To verify what is claimed in the quickspecs:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://h18004.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/13127_na/13127_na.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://h18004.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/13127_na/13127_na.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;or is there something else you want to see that isn't discussed there?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 00:04:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/spanning-on-a-cv-flex10/m-p/4641316#M10405</guid>
      <dc:creator>rick jones</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-03T00:04:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

