<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Flex10 IGMP snooping and Data-driven IGMP in BladeSystem - General</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/flex10-igmp-snooping-and-data-driven-igmp/m-p/4660446#M10891</link>
    <description>Hi, &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;we own a C7000 with two Flex-10 10Gb. Also, we have some B460C G5. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I observe strange behavior of IGMP snooping, it seems that it does not work if the network is not linked to an uplink port. Is it an expected behavior? I observe correct behavior if the network is connected to an uplink port even if multicast traffic is sent and received inside the blade center.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;moreover, does the Flex-10 module handle Data-driven IGMP?</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 06:54:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>vincentrichard</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-07-13T06:54:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Flex10 IGMP snooping and Data-driven IGMP</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/flex10-igmp-snooping-and-data-driven-igmp/m-p/4660446#M10891</link>
      <description>Hi, &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;we own a C7000 with two Flex-10 10Gb. Also, we have some B460C G5. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I observe strange behavior of IGMP snooping, it seems that it does not work if the network is not linked to an uplink port. Is it an expected behavior? I observe correct behavior if the network is connected to an uplink port even if multicast traffic is sent and received inside the blade center.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;moreover, does the Flex-10 module handle Data-driven IGMP?</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 06:54:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/flex10-igmp-snooping-and-data-driven-igmp/m-p/4660446#M10891</guid>
      <dc:creator>vincentrichard</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-13T06:54:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Flex10 IGMP snooping and Data-driven IGMP</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/flex10-igmp-snooping-and-data-driven-igmp/m-p/4660447#M10892</link>
      <description>There is a specific fix for IGMP Snooping in VC firmware version 2.33, please make sure you are using that version.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Flex-10 does not currently support Data-driven IGMP, in other words it floods all unregistered multicast.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 16:03:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/flex10-igmp-snooping-and-data-driven-igmp/m-p/4660447#M10892</guid>
      <dc:creator>HEM_2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-13T16:03:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Flex10 IGMP snooping and Data-driven IGMP</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/flex10-igmp-snooping-and-data-driven-igmp/m-p/4660448#M10893</link>
      <description>Some Cisco IOS versions also have a similar bug/issue: their IGMP snooping feature does not really work if nobody in the segment is sending IGMP queries.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;A multicast-aware router will periodically send IGMP queries, fulfilling the requirement. If the segment is non-routable (e.g. an isolated network segment for security reasons), there is a "IGMP Querier" feature that can fulfill the requirement without an actual multicast router.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;See Cisco's document about the problem:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_tech_note09186a008059a9df.shtml" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_tech_note09186a008059a9df.shtml&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It lists 5 possible solutions/workarounds. Perhaps some of those ideas are applicable in the blade center too?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;MK</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:46:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/flex10-igmp-snooping-and-data-driven-igmp/m-p/4660448#M10893</guid>
      <dc:creator>Matti_Kurkela</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-14T12:46:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Flex10 IGMP snooping and Data-driven IGMP</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/flex10-igmp-snooping-and-data-driven-igmp/m-p/4660449#M10894</link>
      <description>HEM, Yes I am already in 2.33 firmware. Thanks for information about Data-driven IGMP.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Matti Kurkela, My problem is not flooding when there is no "IGMP querier" it seems that it is normal for a non Data-driven IGMP Switch. but my problem is that behavior change if it is a network that has an uplink port or has not.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;if there is no uplink port even if I have a/some "IGMP querier" the multicast is received on every blades.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 07:13:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/flex10-igmp-snooping-and-data-driven-igmp/m-p/4660449#M10894</guid>
      <dc:creator>vincentrichard</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-15T07:13:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

