<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Mixed Module VC Domains. in BladeSystem - General</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/mixed-module-vc-domains/m-p/5221563#M16273</link>
    <description>&lt;!--!*#--&gt;    Right now I have 1/10G VC ENet modules in bays 1,2,3 &amp;amp; 4, on all of my c7000 enclosures.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;    I am intending to upgrade so that I have &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Flex10 VC ENet modules in Bays 1 &amp;amp; 2,  and&lt;BR /&gt;1/10G VC ENet modules in Bays 3 &amp;amp; 4, &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;on all of my c7000.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Question 1, Are there any issues with stacking between 1/10G and Flex10 Modules ??&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The documentation doesnt discriminate between different VC ENet modules, so the assumption is that this will be OK.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Question 2:   I ultimately intend to setup VCEM on my enclosures.   I believe that the physical configs of the IC bays have to be identical on all participating enclosures.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is this Correct  ???&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Question 3:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;After upgrading to the Flex10 Modules, my configs will look like this;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1.    Flex10        2.   Flex10&lt;BR /&gt;3.    1/10Gb        4.   1/10Gb&lt;BR /&gt;5.    4Gb FC        6.   4Gb FC&lt;BR /&gt;7.    4Gb FC        8.   4Gb FC&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Does this config look OK.   Any issues with it.   &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am not really interested in whether it is the best config, only whether it will work.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Dave.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:38:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>The Brit</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-01-25T20:38:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Mixed Module VC Domains.</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/mixed-module-vc-domains/m-p/5221563#M16273</link>
      <description>&lt;!--!*#--&gt;    Right now I have 1/10G VC ENet modules in bays 1,2,3 &amp;amp; 4, on all of my c7000 enclosures.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;    I am intending to upgrade so that I have &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Flex10 VC ENet modules in Bays 1 &amp;amp; 2,  and&lt;BR /&gt;1/10G VC ENet modules in Bays 3 &amp;amp; 4, &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;on all of my c7000.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Question 1, Are there any issues with stacking between 1/10G and Flex10 Modules ??&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The documentation doesnt discriminate between different VC ENet modules, so the assumption is that this will be OK.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Question 2:   I ultimately intend to setup VCEM on my enclosures.   I believe that the physical configs of the IC bays have to be identical on all participating enclosures.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is this Correct  ???&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Question 3:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;After upgrading to the Flex10 Modules, my configs will look like this;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1.    Flex10        2.   Flex10&lt;BR /&gt;3.    1/10Gb        4.   1/10Gb&lt;BR /&gt;5.    4Gb FC        6.   4Gb FC&lt;BR /&gt;7.    4Gb FC        8.   4Gb FC&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Does this config look OK.   Any issues with it.   &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am not really interested in whether it is the best config, only whether it will work.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Dave.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:38:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/mixed-module-vc-domains/m-p/5221563#M16273</guid>
      <dc:creator>The Brit</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-25T20:38:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mixed Module VC Domains.</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/mixed-module-vc-domains/m-p/5221564#M16274</link>
      <description>Dave,&lt;BR /&gt;1. No problem, I seen documents that mention this can be done. Are you going to use 0.5 metre CX4 cables? I would.&lt;BR /&gt;2. Enclosures in the same Domain Groups must be the same. But you can have many domain groups. I have heard mention that you could have blade enclosures that are a subset of the domain group config, but definitely not interconnect differences. I have not been able to check this - but would not recommend it anyway.&lt;BR /&gt;3. Thats fine but only Full height servers with a HBA in Mezz3 will be able to connect to bays 7 &amp;amp; 8.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:59:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/mixed-module-vc-domains/m-p/5221564#M16274</guid>
      <dc:creator>Adrian Clint</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-25T20:59:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mixed Module VC Domains.</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/mixed-module-vc-domains/m-p/5221565#M16275</link>
      <description>Thanks again Adrian.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1.   Yes I will be using CX4's.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;2.   I need to look into exactly what is meant by a domain group, however at the moment, I am looking at creating 2 different Enterprise domains since I have enclosures at different sites which are several miles apart.    In any case, I currently only have 2 enclosures at each site.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;3.   I appreciate that 7 &amp;amp; 8 are primarily only used by full height blades.   I have bl860c's running OpenVMS, both clustered and standalone systems. I also have 465 G1/G5/G6 running Windows (ESX/VMWare) and Linux.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;lots of fun!!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Dave.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:57:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/mixed-module-vc-domains/m-p/5221565#M16275</guid>
      <dc:creator>The Brit</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-26T00:57:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mixed Module VC Domains.</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/mixed-module-vc-domains/m-p/5221566#M16276</link>
      <description>Dave,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Enterprise Domain Group (More than one enclosure -  controlled by VCEM thru SIM .... many enclosures I think more than 200)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As opposed to a multi-enclosure stacking for VC which controlled by VC fimrware in one of the chassis (Must be Flex-10 or 1/10F in "master" chassis) and has a max of four chassis.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you have two enclosures at each site you probably dont need to use VCEM. Just stack the enclosures. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?lang=en&amp;amp;cc=us&amp;amp;taskId=115&amp;amp;prodSeriesId=3201263&amp;amp;prodTypeId=329290&amp;amp;objectID=c01724621" target="_blank"&gt;http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?lang=en&amp;amp;cc=us&amp;amp;taskId=115&amp;amp;prodSeriesId=3201263&amp;amp;prodTypeId=329290&amp;amp;objectID=c01724621&lt;/A&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:14:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/mixed-module-vc-domains/m-p/5221566#M16276</guid>
      <dc:creator>Adrian Clint</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-26T20:14:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

