<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: N+N and N+1 Redundancy in BladeSystem - General</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/n-n-and-n-1-redundancy/m-p/4566402#M20447</link>
    <description>Hi Mikap, &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I did not get it still, does that mean that If I have 4 Power Supplies, for N+1 I can configure one of the 4 PS to be the standby and the remaining 3 to be Active? For N+N does that mean I can configure 4 PS into 2 Active and 2 Standby or in 6 PS for N+N config I can set 3 Active and 3 Standby?</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 01:42:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mi77</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-01-20T01:42:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>N+N and N+1 Redundancy</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/n-n-and-n-1-redundancy/m-p/4566399#M20444</link>
      <description>What is N+N and N+1 Redundancy and what is or are the differences of these 2 power redundancy?</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 04:08:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/n-n-and-n-1-redundancy/m-p/4566399#M20444</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mi77</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-19T04:08:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: N+N and N+1 Redundancy</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/n-n-and-n-1-redundancy/m-p/4566400#M20445</link>
      <description>hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;check this page, maybe it will help you :&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uninterruptible_power_supply" target="_blank"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uninterruptible_power_supply&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;mikap</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:23:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/n-n-and-n-1-redundancy/m-p/4566400#M20445</guid>
      <dc:creator>Michal Kapalka (mikap)</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-19T09:23:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: N+N and N+1 Redundancy</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/n-n-and-n-1-redundancy/m-p/4566401#M20446</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;this is in Blade specification :&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Full power redundancy with N+N hot-plug power supplies and the flexibility of N+1 redundancy &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;and also some thread about N+N / N+1&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;[Broken link removed on &amp;lt;4/18/2017&amp;gt; by Mod] &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;mikap&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2017 17:09:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/n-n-and-n-1-redundancy/m-p/4566401#M20446</guid>
      <dc:creator>Michal Kapalka (mikap)</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-18T17:09:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: N+N and N+1 Redundancy</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/n-n-and-n-1-redundancy/m-p/4566402#M20447</link>
      <description>Hi Mikap, &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I did not get it still, does that mean that If I have 4 Power Supplies, for N+1 I can configure one of the 4 PS to be the standby and the remaining 3 to be Active? For N+N does that mean I can configure 4 PS into 2 Active and 2 Standby or in 6 PS for N+N config I can set 3 Active and 3 Standby?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 01:42:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/n-n-and-n-1-redundancy/m-p/4566402#M20447</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mi77</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-20T01:42:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: N+N and N+1 Redundancy</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/n-n-and-n-1-redundancy/m-p/4566403#M20448</link>
      <description>Hi..&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Yes..your understanding is correct.&lt;BR /&gt;for N+1  - suppose you have 4 PS, 3 will be active and 1 will act as standby(redundancy). &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;for N+N - suppose you have 4 PS, 2 will be used, and rest 2 will be for standby(redundancy)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:01:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/n-n-and-n-1-redundancy/m-p/4566403#M20448</guid>
      <dc:creator>THAKUR</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-20T12:01:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: N+N and N+1 Redundancy</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/n-n-and-n-1-redundancy/m-p/4566404#M20449</link>
      <description>Thanks Thakur, this forum is really great with helpful people's contribution :-)</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 01:36:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/n-n-and-n-1-redundancy/m-p/4566404#M20449</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mi77</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-21T01:36:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: N+N and N+1 Redundancy</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/n-n-and-n-1-redundancy/m-p/6758209#M20451</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What if there are only 2 PS? Is it:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;N+1 - 1 active &amp;amp; 1 standby&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;N+N - 1 active &amp;amp; 1 standby&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then this means there is no difference among N+1 &amp;amp; N+N redundancy in case of 2 PS?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Does N+1 meant both the 2 &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;PS&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;to be in active mode (active-active} in this case?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2015 04:54:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/n-n-and-n-1-redundancy/m-p/6758209#M20451</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rishi2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-06-24T04:54:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: N+N and N+1 Redundancy</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/n-n-and-n-1-redundancy/m-p/6979581#M21059</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Rishi2:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;N+1 and N+N are by default&amp;nbsp;terms used in a redundancy context.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When you only have 2 PS, you can't speak about N+N as that isn't redundant. With 2 PS there is only N+N possible.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rgrds,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2017 09:08:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/n-n-and-n-1-redundancy/m-p/6979581#M21059</guid>
      <dc:creator>NiMaec</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-10T09:08:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

