<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ESX Load Balance with Virtual Connect? in BladeSystem - General</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/esx-load-balance-with-virtual-connect/m-p/4159486#M2261</link>
    <description>Hi All,&lt;BR /&gt;We are using Virtual Connect with 802.3 AD Port Groups and VLAN Trunks. I would like to be able to map 2 VC Networks to 4 NICs (on 1 blade) in a single ESX virtual switch. I know IP Hash cannot be used but will Port ID or MAC Hash work algrorithings work? I want to simplify my Virtual Switch by doing this. Also, will this cause any bad overhead? Thanks for any help!!</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:04:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>TokenBling</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-03-11T18:04:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ESX Load Balance with Virtual Connect?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/esx-load-balance-with-virtual-connect/m-p/4159486#M2261</link>
      <description>Hi All,&lt;BR /&gt;We are using Virtual Connect with 802.3 AD Port Groups and VLAN Trunks. I would like to be able to map 2 VC Networks to 4 NICs (on 1 blade) in a single ESX virtual switch. I know IP Hash cannot be used but will Port ID or MAC Hash work algrorithings work? I want to simplify my Virtual Switch by doing this. Also, will this cause any bad overhead? Thanks for any help!!</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:04:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/esx-load-balance-with-virtual-connect/m-p/4159486#M2261</guid>
      <dc:creator>TokenBling</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-03-11T18:04:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ESX Load Balance with Virtual Connect?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/esx-load-balance-with-virtual-connect/m-p/4159487#M2262</link>
      <description>Port ID or MAC Hash will work as they don't require any port trunking on the downlinks of the directly connected switch (in this case VC)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I don't know of any overhead that will be caused.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;having 2 VC networks will give you an active/active type of configuration, i.e. both VC networks will have active connections and provide more bandwidth to the servers.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:21:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/esx-load-balance-with-virtual-connect/m-p/4159487#M2262</guid>
      <dc:creator>HEM_2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-03-12T15:21:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ESX Load Balance with Virtual Connect?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/esx-load-balance-with-virtual-connect/m-p/4159488#M2263</link>
      <description>Wonderful thank you for the response.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:00:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/esx-load-balance-with-virtual-connect/m-p/4159488#M2263</guid>
      <dc:creator>TokenBling</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-03-12T17:00:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

