<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Blade Switch Comparison Question. in BladeSystem - General</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/blade-switch-comparison-question/m-p/1359#M24062</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Question:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We have a customer that is doing aircraft traffic simulations for airports/country.&amp;nbsp; Their application requires a graphics card for each blade and each blade represents an airplane in flight.&amp;nbsp; The jobs are dispatched through a master controller (I don't know if the blades also communicate directly with each other).&amp;nbsp; This program started close to two years ago with xw460c blade workstations with fx560 graphics and BLc Bnt 1GbE2 interconnects in the enclosures.&amp;nbsp; They currently have 16 full enclosures operational and they have an open order for an additional 8 enclosures.&amp;nbsp; The factory says the BLc BNT 1GbE2 is no longer available and wants to substitute the BLc GbE2c LY 2/3.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is the performance of these two switches the same?&amp;nbsp; Is the management of these two switches the same?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It is critical to this customer that all switches in this network can be configured to interoperate at the same performance level and provide the same capabilities.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Answer from Derek:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As far as they are concerned it is the same beast but can support L3 functionality if needed - the earlier model could not.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 13:37:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>chuckk281</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-02-02T13:37:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Blade Switch Comparison Question.</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/blade-switch-comparison-question/m-p/1359#M24062</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Question:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We have a customer that is doing aircraft traffic simulations for airports/country.&amp;nbsp; Their application requires a graphics card for each blade and each blade represents an airplane in flight.&amp;nbsp; The jobs are dispatched through a master controller (I don't know if the blades also communicate directly with each other).&amp;nbsp; This program started close to two years ago with xw460c blade workstations with fx560 graphics and BLc Bnt 1GbE2 interconnects in the enclosures.&amp;nbsp; They currently have 16 full enclosures operational and they have an open order for an additional 8 enclosures.&amp;nbsp; The factory says the BLc BNT 1GbE2 is no longer available and wants to substitute the BLc GbE2c LY 2/3.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is the performance of these two switches the same?&amp;nbsp; Is the management of these two switches the same?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It is critical to this customer that all switches in this network can be configured to interoperate at the same performance level and provide the same capabilities.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Answer from Derek:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As far as they are concerned it is the same beast but can support L3 functionality if needed - the earlier model could not.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 13:37:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/blade-switch-comparison-question/m-p/1359#M24062</guid>
      <dc:creator>chuckk281</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-02T13:37:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

