<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic VC E/net module port failover in BladeSystem - General</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/vc-e-net-module-port-failover/m-p/4201721#M2850</link>
    <description>Setting up our c7000 right now trying to perform some testing on the failover process.&lt;BR /&gt;For simplicity sake, we have a VC enet module in both bay 1 and 2. Have a shared uplink set on bay 1 consisting of ports 1,2 (trunked at the switch level) and a secondary shared uplink set in bay 2 ports 1,2 (trunked at the switch level). So essentially trunked 2 gig uplink for prod and 2 gig uplink for failover.&lt;BR /&gt;Should i be able to pull (essentially to imitate a failure) ports 1,2 out and have the failover take place to the uplink defined on Bay 2? The thought right now is to define a shared uplink, and add the bandwidth (ports) as needed however retain the ports in bay 2 for redundancy sake. I would think mapping the servers to the shared uplink ports on bay 1 would work, then have bay 2 mirror bay 1 from a port standpoint back to the switch. or do I have to point pnet1 to bay 1 and pnet 2 to bay to in order to retain the failover capability?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;thanks for the assistance</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 21:52:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Derek Brawders_2</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-05-20T21:52:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>VC E/net module port failover</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/vc-e-net-module-port-failover/m-p/4201721#M2850</link>
      <description>Setting up our c7000 right now trying to perform some testing on the failover process.&lt;BR /&gt;For simplicity sake, we have a VC enet module in both bay 1 and 2. Have a shared uplink set on bay 1 consisting of ports 1,2 (trunked at the switch level) and a secondary shared uplink set in bay 2 ports 1,2 (trunked at the switch level). So essentially trunked 2 gig uplink for prod and 2 gig uplink for failover.&lt;BR /&gt;Should i be able to pull (essentially to imitate a failure) ports 1,2 out and have the failover take place to the uplink defined on Bay 2? The thought right now is to define a shared uplink, and add the bandwidth (ports) as needed however retain the ports in bay 2 for redundancy sake. I would think mapping the servers to the shared uplink ports on bay 1 would work, then have bay 2 mirror bay 1 from a port standpoint back to the switch. or do I have to point pnet1 to bay 1 and pnet 2 to bay to in order to retain the failover capability?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;thanks for the assistance</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 21:52:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/vc-e-net-module-port-failover/m-p/4201721#M2850</guid>
      <dc:creator>Derek Brawders_2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-05-20T21:52:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

