<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Problem with 560flb and FlexFabric 10Gb/24-Port Modules in BladeSystem - General</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/problem-with-560flb-and-flexfabric-10gb-24-port-modules/m-p/7041887#M29182</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, I have a problem that Virtual Connect won't seem to split up my 560FLB nics into multiple nics. Perhaps I am missing something really stupid here.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To replace our previous C7000 chassis with gen8 blades, we now have a new C7000 chassis with BL460c gen10 blades and 2 VC FlexFabric 10Gb/24-Port Modules. Each blade has a HP Ethernet 10Gb 2-port 560FLB Adapter. Fiber channel uplinks to the SAN and Ethernet uplinks are configured correctly. But when I create a server profile with 2 ethernet connections and 2 fcoe hba connections, only the first two network adapters are mapped.&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;The mappings:&lt;BR /&gt;LOM1:1 =&amp;gt; Bay 1:d1&lt;BR /&gt;LOM1:2 =&amp;gt; Bay 2:d1&lt;BR /&gt;The FCoE HBA connections are not mapped, and of course I get a warning that not all connections are mapped.&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;What I would expect, is that VC would automatically configure the NICs on the blades to split up.&amp;nbsp;If I look on the old blades (that have the 650FLB adapters) I see that the nics are split up into LOM1:1-a, LOM1:1-b, etc, and all ports are mapped:&lt;BR /&gt;LOM1:1-a =&amp;gt; Bay 1:d1:v1&lt;BR /&gt;LOM1:2-a =&amp;gt; Bay 2:d1:v1&lt;BR /&gt;LOM1:1-b =&amp;gt; Bay 1:d1:v2&lt;BR /&gt;LOM1:2-b =&amp;gt; Bay 2:d1:v2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How can I get my 560FLB's to split up correctly?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2019 12:27:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>AxisNL</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-04-10T12:27:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Problem with 560flb and FlexFabric 10Gb/24-Port Modules</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/problem-with-560flb-and-flexfabric-10gb-24-port-modules/m-p/7041887#M29182</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, I have a problem that Virtual Connect won't seem to split up my 560FLB nics into multiple nics. Perhaps I am missing something really stupid here.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To replace our previous C7000 chassis with gen8 blades, we now have a new C7000 chassis with BL460c gen10 blades and 2 VC FlexFabric 10Gb/24-Port Modules. Each blade has a HP Ethernet 10Gb 2-port 560FLB Adapter. Fiber channel uplinks to the SAN and Ethernet uplinks are configured correctly. But when I create a server profile with 2 ethernet connections and 2 fcoe hba connections, only the first two network adapters are mapped.&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;The mappings:&lt;BR /&gt;LOM1:1 =&amp;gt; Bay 1:d1&lt;BR /&gt;LOM1:2 =&amp;gt; Bay 2:d1&lt;BR /&gt;The FCoE HBA connections are not mapped, and of course I get a warning that not all connections are mapped.&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;What I would expect, is that VC would automatically configure the NICs on the blades to split up.&amp;nbsp;If I look on the old blades (that have the 650FLB adapters) I see that the nics are split up into LOM1:1-a, LOM1:1-b, etc, and all ports are mapped:&lt;BR /&gt;LOM1:1-a =&amp;gt; Bay 1:d1:v1&lt;BR /&gt;LOM1:2-a =&amp;gt; Bay 2:d1:v1&lt;BR /&gt;LOM1:1-b =&amp;gt; Bay 1:d1:v2&lt;BR /&gt;LOM1:2-b =&amp;gt; Bay 2:d1:v2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How can I get my 560FLB's to split up correctly?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2019 12:27:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/problem-with-560flb-and-flexfabric-10gb-24-port-modules/m-p/7041887#M29182</guid>
      <dc:creator>AxisNL</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-10T12:27:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problem with 560flb and FlexFabric 10Gb/24-Port Modules</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/problem-with-560flb-and-flexfabric-10gb-24-port-modules/m-p/7042230#M29183</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You are comparing 2 different adapters.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;650 flb is flex fabric and 560flb is ethernet. so it you cannot map it to fcoe connections&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here are the quick specs for both adapters&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://support.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US&amp;amp;docId=emr_na-c04446451" target="_blank"&gt;https://support.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US&amp;amp;docId=emr_na-c04446451&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://h20195.www2.hpe.com/v2/GetPDF.aspx/c04111516.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;https://h20195.www2.hpe.com/v2/GetPDF.aspx/c04111516.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2019 18:23:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/problem-with-560flb-and-flexfabric-10gb-24-port-modules/m-p/7042230#M29183</guid>
      <dc:creator>ARK123</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-12T18:23:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problem with 560flb and FlexFabric 10Gb/24-Port Modules</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/problem-with-560flb-and-flexfabric-10gb-24-port-modules/m-p/7042232#M29184</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks, I just opened a case with HPE an got a call from them, telling me the same thing. Thanks for your reply!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2019 18:46:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/problem-with-560flb-and-flexfabric-10gb-24-port-modules/m-p/7042232#M29184</guid>
      <dc:creator>AxisNL</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-12T18:46:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

