<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Virtual Connect Active\Active Hyper-V setup in BladeSystem - General</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/virtual-connect-active-active-hyper-v-setup/m-p/6806642#M29715</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I’m quite new to Virtual connect and have come up with a design for our Hyper-v 2012R2 environment that I’d like some feedback on if possible.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have a C7000 chassis with 2x 10Gb FlexFabric 24 port modules and we have an ISCSI P4000 SAN.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I’d like this setup to be an active\active configuration&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;In virtual connect I’ve configured the following:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Production Networks&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For the production vSwitch, live migration, CSV, and management networks I’ve created two SUSes carrying multiple VLANS&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1x SUS mapped to port X1 and X2 in VC module bay 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Both uplinks are connected to 2 Trunk ports on switch &lt;STRONG&gt;1&lt;/STRONG&gt; (Cisco Nexus 5548) link aggregation configured&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1x SUS mapped to port X1 and X2 in VC module bay 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Both uplinks are connected to 2 Trunk ports on switch &lt;STRONG&gt;2&lt;/STRONG&gt; (Cisco Nexus 5548) link aggregation configured&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;For ISCSI&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1x dedicated link mapped to port X5 and X6 in VC module bay 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Both uplinks are connected to 2 Access ports on Switch &lt;STRONG&gt;3&lt;/STRONG&gt; (Cisco Nexus 5548) link aggregation configured&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1x dedicated link mapped to port X5 and X6 in VC module bay 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Both uplinks are connected to 2 Access ports on Switch &lt;STRONG&gt;4&lt;/STRONG&gt; (Cisco Nexus 5548) link aggregation configured&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On each blade, I would team the FlexNics assigned to the SUSes, create a Vswtich on top of the team, and then create tagged Vnics for live migration, management and CSV networks.&amp;nbsp; Virtual machines would connect through the same Vswitch and be tagged for their specific network.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My questions,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do I need to use SUSes, or should I instead configure and replace them with two Tunnelled Vnets instead?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What are the advantages\disadvantages of doing this?&amp;nbsp; From what I understand, if I use VLAN tunnelling, which seems like less to configure in VC, the Hyper-V switch identifies the tag and directs the packet as necessary.&amp;nbsp; Whereas, if I continue to use SUSes, then VC will need to identify the tag first and then the Hyper-V switch will still need to do it again anyway.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are there any issues with using link aggregation for my ISCSI NICs on the upstream switch?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do I need SmartLink enabled on any of these Vnets with the way I’ve configured it, and if so, why?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2015 13:20:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ALgon</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-10-28T13:20:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Virtual Connect Active\Active Hyper-V setup</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/virtual-connect-active-active-hyper-v-setup/m-p/6806642#M29715</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I’m quite new to Virtual connect and have come up with a design for our Hyper-v 2012R2 environment that I’d like some feedback on if possible.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have a C7000 chassis with 2x 10Gb FlexFabric 24 port modules and we have an ISCSI P4000 SAN.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I’d like this setup to be an active\active configuration&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;In virtual connect I’ve configured the following:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Production Networks&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For the production vSwitch, live migration, CSV, and management networks I’ve created two SUSes carrying multiple VLANS&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1x SUS mapped to port X1 and X2 in VC module bay 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Both uplinks are connected to 2 Trunk ports on switch &lt;STRONG&gt;1&lt;/STRONG&gt; (Cisco Nexus 5548) link aggregation configured&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1x SUS mapped to port X1 and X2 in VC module bay 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Both uplinks are connected to 2 Trunk ports on switch &lt;STRONG&gt;2&lt;/STRONG&gt; (Cisco Nexus 5548) link aggregation configured&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;For ISCSI&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1x dedicated link mapped to port X5 and X6 in VC module bay 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Both uplinks are connected to 2 Access ports on Switch &lt;STRONG&gt;3&lt;/STRONG&gt; (Cisco Nexus 5548) link aggregation configured&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1x dedicated link mapped to port X5 and X6 in VC module bay 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Both uplinks are connected to 2 Access ports on Switch &lt;STRONG&gt;4&lt;/STRONG&gt; (Cisco Nexus 5548) link aggregation configured&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On each blade, I would team the FlexNics assigned to the SUSes, create a Vswtich on top of the team, and then create tagged Vnics for live migration, management and CSV networks.&amp;nbsp; Virtual machines would connect through the same Vswitch and be tagged for their specific network.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My questions,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do I need to use SUSes, or should I instead configure and replace them with two Tunnelled Vnets instead?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What are the advantages\disadvantages of doing this?&amp;nbsp; From what I understand, if I use VLAN tunnelling, which seems like less to configure in VC, the Hyper-V switch identifies the tag and directs the packet as necessary.&amp;nbsp; Whereas, if I continue to use SUSes, then VC will need to identify the tag first and then the Hyper-V switch will still need to do it again anyway.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are there any issues with using link aggregation for my ISCSI NICs on the upstream switch?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do I need SmartLink enabled on any of these Vnets with the way I’ve configured it, and if so, why?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2015 13:20:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/virtual-connect-active-active-hyper-v-setup/m-p/6806642#M29715</guid>
      <dc:creator>ALgon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-28T13:20:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

