<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Incorrect NIC number reporting in BladeSystem - General</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/incorrect-nic-number-reporting/m-p/6807772#M29722</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Similar issue on the WIndows side of things, if I configure the 630FLB on a 460c Gen9 to be ALL NICs(no FC) and I have the hide unused flexnics check, NICs 3&amp;amp;4 show up as "Not pluggin in".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With Windows(2012/R2), right-click disable, rename to something like "Not Used" and ignore them.....&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2015 02:52:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>AkiraX</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-10-31T02:52:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Incorrect NIC number reporting</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/incorrect-nic-number-reporting/m-p/6777738#M29720</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have 2x bl460 with a HP FlexFabric 20Gb 630FLB with problems. &amp;nbsp;The LOM information in the iLo are listed below&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ethernet FlexNIC (NIC 1)&lt;BR /&gt;FCoE FlexHBA LOM1:1-b&lt;BR /&gt;Ethernet FlexNIC (NIC 5) LOM1:1-c&lt;BR /&gt;Ethernet FlexNIC (NIC 7) LOM1:1-d&lt;BR /&gt;Ethernet FlexNIC (NIC 2) LOM1:2-a&lt;BR /&gt;FCoE FlexHBA LOM1:2-b&lt;BR /&gt;Ethernet FlexNIC (NIC 6) LOM1:2-c&lt;BR /&gt;Ethernet FlexNIC (NIC 8) LOM1:2-d&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As you can see, the FCoE FlexHBA LOM1:1 and 1:2 seem to be taking up the spot for NIC3 and NIC4&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So when i install ESXi, my 4 IP network adapters are labelled NIC1, 2, 5, 6.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All my other blades (60 odd) are smart enough to realise this and number the IP adapters as NIC1, 2, 3, 4....but i have 2 blades that just will not budge from NIC1, 2, 5, 6.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any ideas?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2015 03:43:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/incorrect-nic-number-reporting/m-p/6777738#M29720</guid>
      <dc:creator>csouthy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-25T03:43:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Incorrect NIC number reporting</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/incorrect-nic-number-reporting/m-p/6783109#M29721</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm seeing the same issue with a BL460c Gen9 with a 630FLB in Xenserver 6.5. I don't want to use FCoE, I just want to use this as a NIC, and an HBA. I can't get an answer from HP if that is possible, as everything on the 630FLB nic is showing that it is FCoE.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have the 554FLB and it works as a FC HBA and a NIC - that's what I want the 630 to do.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HP? Anyone?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2015 16:08:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/incorrect-nic-number-reporting/m-p/6783109#M29721</guid>
      <dc:creator>langsbr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-09-09T16:08:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Incorrect NIC number reporting</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/incorrect-nic-number-reporting/m-p/6807772#M29722</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Similar issue on the WIndows side of things, if I configure the 630FLB on a 460c Gen9 to be ALL NICs(no FC) and I have the hide unused flexnics check, NICs 3&amp;amp;4 show up as "Not pluggin in".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With Windows(2012/R2), right-click disable, rename to something like "Not Used" and ignore them.....&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2015 02:52:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/incorrect-nic-number-reporting/m-p/6807772#M29722</guid>
      <dc:creator>AkiraX</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-31T02:52:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

