<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Virtual Connect profile issue or VMware device enumeration issue? in BladeSystem - General</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/virtual-connect-profile-issue-or-vmware-device-enumeration-issue/m-p/6362139#M30732</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Virtual Connect profile issue or VMware device enumeration issue?&amp;nbsp; Or what ... ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As stated above I have something of an odd issue with either the server profiles or possibly the way the hypevisor enumerated the devices...I am not sure which&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have 4 - BL 460 G6 blades in a G2 chassis using &amp;nbsp;2 -&amp;nbsp;3020 blade switches.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;All 4 blades have the NC325m Quad Port 1Gb NIC for c-Class BladeSystem in mezz slot 2 (only 2 active nics since bays 7 and 8 are empty...).&amp;nbsp; Also the LOM is Flex-10 Embedded Ethernet Ethernet FlexNIC&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The issue is, on 2 of the blades the active nics show up as 2 and 3...on the other two blades tha active nics show up as 8 and 9.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While this is not a huge deal to configure the hypervisor on 4 blades, I was hoping to uses host profiles since we are supposed to get the remaining 12 blades back from the current use for this new project...with that said doing a standard config on 16 blades by hand will cause some config drift ...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyone else seen this?&amp;nbsp; Am I missing something tottally obvious?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any insight...ideas etc would be greatly appreciated!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 16:21:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ShawnPD49</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-02-03T16:21:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Virtual Connect profile issue or VMware device enumeration issue?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/virtual-connect-profile-issue-or-vmware-device-enumeration-issue/m-p/6362139#M30732</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Virtual Connect profile issue or VMware device enumeration issue?&amp;nbsp; Or what ... ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As stated above I have something of an odd issue with either the server profiles or possibly the way the hypevisor enumerated the devices...I am not sure which&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have 4 - BL 460 G6 blades in a G2 chassis using &amp;nbsp;2 -&amp;nbsp;3020 blade switches.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;All 4 blades have the NC325m Quad Port 1Gb NIC for c-Class BladeSystem in mezz slot 2 (only 2 active nics since bays 7 and 8 are empty...).&amp;nbsp; Also the LOM is Flex-10 Embedded Ethernet Ethernet FlexNIC&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The issue is, on 2 of the blades the active nics show up as 2 and 3...on the other two blades tha active nics show up as 8 and 9.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While this is not a huge deal to configure the hypervisor on 4 blades, I was hoping to uses host profiles since we are supposed to get the remaining 12 blades back from the current use for this new project...with that said doing a standard config on 16 blades by hand will cause some config drift ...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyone else seen this?&amp;nbsp; Am I missing something tottally obvious?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any insight...ideas etc would be greatly appreciated!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 16:21:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/virtual-connect-profile-issue-or-vmware-device-enumeration-issue/m-p/6362139#M30732</guid>
      <dc:creator>ShawnPD49</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-03T16:21:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

