<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Virtual Connect Stacking questions regarding module requirements in BladeSystem - General</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/virtual-connect-stacking-questions-regarding-module-requirements/m-p/6370583#M30745</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Gaston had a MUlti-Enclosure Stacking (MES) question:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;*************&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hello Team, I have a Customer who is planning to cascade 2 C7000 Enclosures. One they have and buy a new one.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In the old Enclosure they have VC Flex-10 Modules in Bay 1 and 2. On the new Enclosure they’re interested in buying the new version Flex-10/10D and configure them in the same Bays. Is cascading supported in this scenario?.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In this document I’ve found that it’s not recommended: &lt;A href="http://h20566.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/template.BINARYPORTLET/public/kb/docDisplay/resource.process/?spf_p.tpst=kbDocDisplay_ws_BI&amp;amp;spf_p.rid_kbDocDisplay=docDisplayResURL&amp;amp;javax.portlet.begCacheTok=com.vignette.cachetoken&amp;amp;spf_p.rst_kbDocDisplay=wsrp-resourceState%3DdocId%253Demr_na-c03801914-2%257CdocLocale%253Den_US&amp;amp;javax.portlet.endCacheTok=com.vignette.cachetoken" target="_blank"&gt;http://h20566.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/template.BINARYPORTLET/public/kb/docDisplay/resource.process/?spf_p.tpst=kbDocDisplay_ws_BI&amp;amp;spf_p.rid_kbDocDisplay=docDisplayResURL&amp;amp;javax.portlet.begCacheTok=com.vignette.cachetoken&amp;amp;spf_p.rst_kbDocDisplay=wsrp-resourceState%3DdocId%253Demr_na-c03801914-2%257CdocLocale%253Den_US&amp;amp;javax.portlet.endCacheTok=com.vignette.cachetoken&lt;/A&gt;,&amp;nbsp;in page 16 it says: “All enclosures must have the same HP VC Flex-10/10D module configuration. For example, if bays 1 and 2 of the Primary Enclosure contain HP VC Flex-10/10D modules, then bays 1 and 2 of Remote Enclosures 1, 2, and 3 must also contain HP VC Flex-10/10D modules.”&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Do you have another point of view?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;***************&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Reply from Fred:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;**********&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The document is correct. The enclosures in a multi-enclosure domain must all have the same module configuration.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Just FYI, the reasoning is that the 10D module, just like FlexFabric, supports FCoE Uplinks.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Anything with FC/FCoE uplinks must be configured identically across all enclosures in a domain.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This rule has been around forever I think in VC.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;***************&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Suggestions?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2014 20:07:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>chuckk281</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-02-10T20:07:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Virtual Connect Stacking questions regarding module requirements</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/virtual-connect-stacking-questions-regarding-module-requirements/m-p/6370583#M30745</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Gaston had a MUlti-Enclosure Stacking (MES) question:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;*************&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hello Team, I have a Customer who is planning to cascade 2 C7000 Enclosures. One they have and buy a new one.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In the old Enclosure they have VC Flex-10 Modules in Bay 1 and 2. On the new Enclosure they’re interested in buying the new version Flex-10/10D and configure them in the same Bays. Is cascading supported in this scenario?.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In this document I’ve found that it’s not recommended: &lt;A href="http://h20566.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/template.BINARYPORTLET/public/kb/docDisplay/resource.process/?spf_p.tpst=kbDocDisplay_ws_BI&amp;amp;spf_p.rid_kbDocDisplay=docDisplayResURL&amp;amp;javax.portlet.begCacheTok=com.vignette.cachetoken&amp;amp;spf_p.rst_kbDocDisplay=wsrp-resourceState%3DdocId%253Demr_na-c03801914-2%257CdocLocale%253Den_US&amp;amp;javax.portlet.endCacheTok=com.vignette.cachetoken" target="_blank"&gt;http://h20566.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/template.BINARYPORTLET/public/kb/docDisplay/resource.process/?spf_p.tpst=kbDocDisplay_ws_BI&amp;amp;spf_p.rid_kbDocDisplay=docDisplayResURL&amp;amp;javax.portlet.begCacheTok=com.vignette.cachetoken&amp;amp;spf_p.rst_kbDocDisplay=wsrp-resourceState%3DdocId%253Demr_na-c03801914-2%257CdocLocale%253Den_US&amp;amp;javax.portlet.endCacheTok=com.vignette.cachetoken&lt;/A&gt;,&amp;nbsp;in page 16 it says: “All enclosures must have the same HP VC Flex-10/10D module configuration. For example, if bays 1 and 2 of the Primary Enclosure contain HP VC Flex-10/10D modules, then bays 1 and 2 of Remote Enclosures 1, 2, and 3 must also contain HP VC Flex-10/10D modules.”&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Do you have another point of view?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;***************&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Reply from Fred:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;**********&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The document is correct. The enclosures in a multi-enclosure domain must all have the same module configuration.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Just FYI, the reasoning is that the 10D module, just like FlexFabric, supports FCoE Uplinks.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Anything with FC/FCoE uplinks must be configured identically across all enclosures in a domain.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This rule has been around forever I think in VC.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;***************&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Suggestions?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2014 20:07:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/virtual-connect-stacking-questions-regarding-module-requirements/m-p/6370583#M30745</guid>
      <dc:creator>chuckk281</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-10T20:07:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

