<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Virtual Connect Active/Active Uplinks question in BladeSystem - General</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/virtual-connect-active-active-uplinks-question/m-p/6525410#M30905</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Talha had a customer question:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;***************&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have a customer with 2 x HP VC Flex-10 Enet Modules.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Usually at customers when a SUS has 2 x Uplinks 1 from each IC Module, the second link is in Standby Mode. However, In this case both are Active, why is this so.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is this because there no Stacking Links between IC Bay 1 and IC Bay 2 (i.e. SFP’s in X7 and X8).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;**************&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Reply from Robert:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;*************&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;That would be the cause, for sure.&amp;nbsp; The loop-avoidance mechanism is not seeing any loop, so no uplinks are in standby state.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This is not a good position to be in, in my view.&amp;nbsp; &lt;U&gt;Why&lt;/U&gt; are there no stacking links between modules???&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;*************&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Input from Mark:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;************&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I agree, fix the stacking link issue.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;***************&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Comments?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:19:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>chuckk281</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-06-30T16:19:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Virtual Connect Active/Active Uplinks question</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/virtual-connect-active-active-uplinks-question/m-p/6525410#M30905</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Talha had a customer question:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;***************&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have a customer with 2 x HP VC Flex-10 Enet Modules.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Usually at customers when a SUS has 2 x Uplinks 1 from each IC Module, the second link is in Standby Mode. However, In this case both are Active, why is this so.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is this because there no Stacking Links between IC Bay 1 and IC Bay 2 (i.e. SFP’s in X7 and X8).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;**************&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Reply from Robert:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;*************&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;That would be the cause, for sure.&amp;nbsp; The loop-avoidance mechanism is not seeing any loop, so no uplinks are in standby state.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This is not a good position to be in, in my view.&amp;nbsp; &lt;U&gt;Why&lt;/U&gt; are there no stacking links between modules???&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;*************&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Input from Mark:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;************&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I agree, fix the stacking link issue.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;***************&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Comments?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:19:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/virtual-connect-active-active-uplinks-question/m-p/6525410#M30905</guid>
      <dc:creator>chuckk281</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-06-30T16:19:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

