<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Multiple VCSU from same client. in BladeSystem - General</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/multiple-vcsu-from-same-client/m-p/5979229#M30986</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Honestly I did not do it (yet). But I don't see a reason why it&amp;nbsp;should fail when run in&amp;nbsp;paralell with the same bin file, at least on Linux.&amp;nbsp;All logfiles and temp directories seem to have names with the process id attached so nothing should get overwritten.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 13:28:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Michael Leu</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-02-28T13:28:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Multiple VCSU from same client.</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/multiple-vcsu-from-same-client/m-p/5974875#M30985</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So far I have been able to run VC domain updates in series, but I can see a point in the future where I will want to run parallel instances of VCSU from the same server. &amp;nbsp;I'm not seeing anything in the user guide that says that won't work. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anyone done it? &amp;nbsp;Does it work fine? &amp;nbsp;Do you use the same bin file for each instance?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 21:34:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/multiple-vcsu-from-same-client/m-p/5974875#M30985</guid>
      <dc:creator>Psychonaut</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-25T21:34:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple VCSU from same client.</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/multiple-vcsu-from-same-client/m-p/5979229#M30986</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Honestly I did not do it (yet). But I don't see a reason why it&amp;nbsp;should fail when run in&amp;nbsp;paralell with the same bin file, at least on Linux.&amp;nbsp;All logfiles and temp directories seem to have names with the process id attached so nothing should get overwritten.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 13:28:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/multiple-vcsu-from-same-client/m-p/5979229#M30986</guid>
      <dc:creator>Michael Leu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-28T13:28:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

