<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Cisco Private VLAN Support in BladeSystem - General</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/cisco-private-vlan-support/m-p/1619#M33150</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 20:53:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>naiman</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-05-07T20:53:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cisco Private VLAN Support</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/cisco-private-vlan-support/m-p/1546#M33149</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;Brian had a simple question:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;**********************************************************************************************************&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;Are Cisco Private VLAN’s supported on Virtual Connect specifically VC-Flex-10?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;*********************************************************************************************************&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;Chris responded:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;**********************************************************************************************************&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;No.&amp;nbsp; PVLAN is a proprietary mechanism, and is not compatible with VC.&amp;nbsp; VC’s Private Network feature has no concept of Community VLANs.&amp;nbsp; Thus, every assigned NIC will not have the ability to communicate with each other.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;****************************************************************************************************&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;Are you using this feature or Private VLANs in general. Let us know where you use them. I would have to make a general statement that if a LAN feature is "proprietary" then Virtual Connect does not implement it. We need to be as IEEE compliant as we can be.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:34:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/cisco-private-vlan-support/m-p/1546#M33149</guid>
      <dc:creator>chuckk281</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-04-23T14:34:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco Private VLAN Support</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/cisco-private-vlan-support/m-p/1619#M33150</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 20:53:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/cisco-private-vlan-support/m-p/1619#M33150</guid>
      <dc:creator>naiman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-07T20:53:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

