<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Can uplinks from different Virtual Connect Flex-10 modules compose trunking by LACP? in BladeSystem - General</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/can-uplinks-from-different-virtual-connect-flex-10-modules/m-p/1158445#M33204</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;Lee was still have LACP issues and when Virtual Connect does what:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;******************************************************************************&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;Maybe I am missing something in this discussion, but I still don’t know if the original question was answered regarding combining uplinks from different VC modules into a single LACP trunk.&amp;nbsp; From the discussion, my understanding is that 2 or more uplinks from a single VC module can be trunked to different HP/Cisco switches that have been combined using the stacking technology in the switches.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;I don’t think that uplinks from different VC modules can be trunked together, as far as I know uplinks from different VC modules can only be configured in a failover mode (but I would like to be proved wrong).&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;*****************************************************************************&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;Dave tried to boil it all down into 4 scenarios:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;**************************************************************************&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;Hi Lee,&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;As described below and further down in the conversation, there are four types of scenarios for port trunking\channeling with&amp;nbsp;traditional Virtual Connect Uplink Ports. If you are adding Cisco's VSS or VCP into the mix, it will have an affect on the view that VC gets from the switches.&amp;nbsp;If they are using VSS / VCP and LACP, then the VC module will see it as one switch. I believe Armand mentioned a white paper that covers the configuration in that scenario. They are not using VSS or VCP, then the rules below would apply, so long as the Cisco switches&amp;nbsp;are configured properly. Hopefully this clears up the comments everyone has made. Bottom-line - in fine Cisco tradition - the answer is "it depends".&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Same VC Module, Same External Switch, Same Port Channel Group &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;When VC uplinks from the same physical VC-Enet module are assigned to the same vNet (or Shared Uplink Set) and are connected to ports on the same external Cisco switch that are assigned to the same port channel group and have the LACP protocol enabled, then VC will automatically form a single port channel.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Same VC Module, Same External Switch, Different Port Channel Groups &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;When VC uplinks from the same physical VC-Enet module are assigned to the same vNet (or Shared Uplink Set) and are connected to ports on the same external Cisco switch that are assigned to different port channel groups and have the LACP protocol enabled, then VC will automatically form more than one port channel.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Same VC Module, Different External Switches &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;When VC uplinks from the same physical VC-Enet module are assigned to the same vNet (or Shared Uplink Set) and are connected to ports on different external Cisco switches that are assigned to port channel groups and have the LACP protocol enabled, then VC will automatically form more than one port channel.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Different VC Module, Same or Different External Switches &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;When VC uplinks from different physical VC-Enet modules are assigned to the same vNet (or Shared Uplink Set) and are connected to ports on the same (or different) external Cisco switch that are assigned to a port channel group and have the LACP protocol enabled, then VC will automatically form more than one port channel.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;**************************************************************************************************&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;I&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt; hope this helps. Any additional clarification needed? Let us know you thoughts and how you implement LACP trunked links.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 14:33:09 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>chuckk281</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-07-16T14:33:09Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Can uplinks from different Virtual Connect Flex-10 modules compose trunking by LACP?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/can-uplinks-from-different-virtual-connect-flex-10-modules/m-p/1158445#M33204</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;Lee was still have LACP issues and when Virtual Connect does what:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;******************************************************************************&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;Maybe I am missing something in this discussion, but I still don’t know if the original question was answered regarding combining uplinks from different VC modules into a single LACP trunk.&amp;nbsp; From the discussion, my understanding is that 2 or more uplinks from a single VC module can be trunked to different HP/Cisco switches that have been combined using the stacking technology in the switches.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;I don’t think that uplinks from different VC modules can be trunked together, as far as I know uplinks from different VC modules can only be configured in a failover mode (but I would like to be proved wrong).&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;*****************************************************************************&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;Dave tried to boil it all down into 4 scenarios:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;**************************************************************************&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;Hi Lee,&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;As described below and further down in the conversation, there are four types of scenarios for port trunking\channeling with&amp;nbsp;traditional Virtual Connect Uplink Ports. If you are adding Cisco's VSS or VCP into the mix, it will have an affect on the view that VC gets from the switches.&amp;nbsp;If they are using VSS / VCP and LACP, then the VC module will see it as one switch. I believe Armand mentioned a white paper that covers the configuration in that scenario. They are not using VSS or VCP, then the rules below would apply, so long as the Cisco switches&amp;nbsp;are configured properly. Hopefully this clears up the comments everyone has made. Bottom-line - in fine Cisco tradition - the answer is "it depends".&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Same VC Module, Same External Switch, Same Port Channel Group &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;When VC uplinks from the same physical VC-Enet module are assigned to the same vNet (or Shared Uplink Set) and are connected to ports on the same external Cisco switch that are assigned to the same port channel group and have the LACP protocol enabled, then VC will automatically form a single port channel.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Same VC Module, Same External Switch, Different Port Channel Groups &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;When VC uplinks from the same physical VC-Enet module are assigned to the same vNet (or Shared Uplink Set) and are connected to ports on the same external Cisco switch that are assigned to different port channel groups and have the LACP protocol enabled, then VC will automatically form more than one port channel.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Same VC Module, Different External Switches &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;When VC uplinks from the same physical VC-Enet module are assigned to the same vNet (or Shared Uplink Set) and are connected to ports on different external Cisco switches that are assigned to port channel groups and have the LACP protocol enabled, then VC will automatically form more than one port channel.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Different VC Module, Same or Different External Switches &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;When VC uplinks from different physical VC-Enet modules are assigned to the same vNet (or Shared Uplink Set) and are connected to ports on the same (or different) external Cisco switch that are assigned to a port channel group and have the LACP protocol enabled, then VC will automatically form more than one port channel.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;**************************************************************************************************&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;I&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt; hope this helps. Any additional clarification needed? Let us know you thoughts and how you implement LACP trunked links.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 14:33:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/can-uplinks-from-different-virtual-connect-flex-10-modules/m-p/1158445#M33204</guid>
      <dc:creator>chuckk281</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-16T14:33:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

