<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Virtual Connect shared uplink set (SUS) question. in BladeSystem - General</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/virtual-connect-shared-uplink-set-sus-question/m-p/1163713#M33286</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;Justo had a Virtual Connect question:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;**********************************************&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hopefully a quick question.. I have a customer that wants to create a LACP shared uplink set on a 1/10Gb-F VC module to aggregate the 4 x 10/100/1000BASE-T ports + the 2 x 1GbE SFP ports = 6Gb LACP set.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I’m nearly sure that we can do this but haven’t been able to find any documentation that explicitly states so.&amp;nbsp; Is this doable?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;*********************************************&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;Mark replied:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;****************************************&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Yes, Virtual Connect will support forming a 6Gb aggregation with these ports as long as they are all running the same speed/duplex.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;***********************************&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Are you using LACP and SUS&amp;nbsp;to get increased bandwidth? Share with us as to how it is working for you.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 20:32:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>chuckk281</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-09-08T20:32:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Virtual Connect shared uplink set (SUS) question.</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/virtual-connect-shared-uplink-set-sus-question/m-p/1163713#M33286</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;Justo had a Virtual Connect question:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;**********************************************&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hopefully a quick question.. I have a customer that wants to create a LACP shared uplink set on a 1/10Gb-F VC module to aggregate the 4 x 10/100/1000BASE-T ports + the 2 x 1GbE SFP ports = 6Gb LACP set.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I’m nearly sure that we can do this but haven’t been able to find any documentation that explicitly states so.&amp;nbsp; Is this doable?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;*********************************************&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;Mark replied:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;****************************************&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Yes, Virtual Connect will support forming a 6Gb aggregation with these ports as long as they are all running the same speed/duplex.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;***********************************&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Are you using LACP and SUS&amp;nbsp;to get increased bandwidth? Share with us as to how it is working for you.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 20:32:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/virtual-connect-shared-uplink-set-sus-question/m-p/1163713#M33286</guid>
      <dc:creator>chuckk281</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-08T20:32:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

