<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Virtual Connect Flex-10 and  Link Aggregation Groups (lAG) in BladeSystem - General</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/virtual-connect-flex-10-and-link-aggregation-groups-lag/m-p/2325751#M33403</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;Leonard had a customer question regarding LAG for Virtual Connect Flex-10:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;***************&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hi Guys&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I had an unusual question from a customer today, on the Flex-10 Interconnects.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;They want to create a LAG using the CX4 port and Ports X2-X4 with 10GbE SR SFP+ modules. Assume that the Cisco end can support it will it work or will the CX4 port become Standby?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;******************&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;Vincent replied:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;***********************&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Shouldn’t be a problem. The only requirement is that all LAG members have the same speed, which is satisfied here.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;*******************&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;Are you using LAG on Virtual Connect? Working well? Let us know.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:29:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>chuckk281</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-11-12T16:29:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Virtual Connect Flex-10 and  Link Aggregation Groups (lAG)</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/virtual-connect-flex-10-and-link-aggregation-groups-lag/m-p/2325751#M33403</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;Leonard had a customer question regarding LAG for Virtual Connect Flex-10:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;***************&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hi Guys&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I had an unusual question from a customer today, on the Flex-10 Interconnects.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;They want to create a LAG using the CX4 port and Ports X2-X4 with 10GbE SR SFP+ modules. Assume that the Cisco end can support it will it work or will the CX4 port become Standby?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;******************&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;Vincent replied:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;***********************&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Shouldn’t be a problem. The only requirement is that all LAG members have the same speed, which is satisfied here.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;*******************&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;Are you using LAG on Virtual Connect? Working well? Let us know.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:29:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/virtual-connect-flex-10-and-link-aggregation-groups-lag/m-p/2325751#M33403</guid>
      <dc:creator>chuckk281</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-12T16:29:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

