<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic BNT VMready compared to VC in BladeSystem - General</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/bnt-vmready-compared-to-vc/m-p/112#M33522</link>
    <description>Hallo all,  I just read about the Blade BNT switches that a software update will be available soon to virtualize the switch ports. It is called VMready and it will be available on the HP BNT blades but also on the IBM BNT switches. Does somebody know how this will compare to the Virtual Connect solutions? How to possition these BNT switches?</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>lodewijk van den berg_1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-01-28T19:44:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>BNT VMready compared to VC</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/bnt-vmready-compared-to-vc/m-p/112#M33522</link>
      <description>Hallo all,  I just read about the Blade BNT switches that a software update will be available soon to virtualize the switch ports. It is called VMready and it will be available on the HP BNT blades but also on the IBM BNT switches. Does somebody know how this will compare to the Virtual Connect solutions? How to possition these BNT switches?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/bnt-vmready-compared-to-vc/m-p/112#M33522</guid>
      <dc:creator>lodewijk van den berg_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-28T19:44:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

