<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Simple question actually in BladeSystem - General</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/simple-question-actually/m-p/1532#M33919</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;As long as you link the VC modules together. You can have and manage upto 4 enclosures with VCM in the same VC Domain.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:56:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>chuckk281</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-04-21T15:56:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Simple question actually</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/simple-question-actually/m-p/1530#M33918</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Can i configure two "standalone" enclosures with the same VC domain name ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And will changes to one enclosure (bv. add vlan in SUS) be propageted to the second enclosure ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Geert&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 08:32:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/simple-question-actually/m-p/1530#M33918</guid>
      <dc:creator>gnijs444</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-04-21T08:32:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Simple question actually</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/simple-question-actually/m-p/1532#M33919</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As long as you link the VC modules together. You can have and manage upto 4 enclosures with VCM in the same VC Domain.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:56:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/simple-question-actually/m-p/1532#M33919</guid>
      <dc:creator>chuckk281</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-04-21T15:56:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Simple question actually</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/simple-question-actually/m-p/1536#M33920</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;By linking the VC modules together, you mean: stacking between the enclosures ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I assume:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Enclosure 1 : VC1a ---- VC1b&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Enclosure 2 : VC2a ---- VC2b&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;is not good. Using VCM only in this scenario, am i right to assume Enclosure1 does not talk to Enclosure2 at all ? (i assume this, as how would Enclosure 1 know about Enclosure 2 ?)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Using VCM only, you should do:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VC1a ---- VC1b&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;lt;--- stack links&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VC2a ---- VC2b&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Of course, then they talk to each other. I understand this scenario.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, in the first scenario:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VC1a --- VC1b&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; : VC_Domain_X&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VC2a --- VC2b&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; : VC_Domain_X&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When i am using VCEM, i can create a VCEM_Group_1 which contains VC_Domain_X &lt;STRONG&gt;and &lt;/STRONG&gt;which contains&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Enclosure1 &lt;/STRONG&gt;and &lt;STRONG&gt;Enclosure2&lt;/STRONG&gt;. This seems to work (no reported errors). But is this supported ? And what are the limitations of this scenario ? (ie. config replication for example vlans on SUS ? hardware position of uplinks ? do they need to be in the same position ?, this is very unclear in the HP documentation)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Geert&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:12:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/simple-question-actually/m-p/1536#M33920</guid>
      <dc:creator>gnijs444</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-04-22T10:12:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

