<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic VC performance question in BladeSystem - General</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/vc-performance-question/m-p/1599#M33947</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;Abhishek had a customer ask about VC pperformance vs. Pas-thru Modules:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;**********************************************************************************************************&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;Are there any performance benchmarks available for VC, in terms of impact on throughput? A customer is interested in the comparison between situations where a VC is used and where a pass-through is used.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;Along the same lines – what is the level of LACP support on VC and how does LACP affect the throughput seen by the servers?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;In principle, LACP should allow aggregation of available VC uplinks into a trunk, hence is it possible to connect N wires across VCs and get a trunk of Nx between them; ie. Say if we link up 8 wires between 1Gbps ports between VC1 and VC2, will the servers behind them see a total throughput of 8Gbps?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;How far does this solution scale – can we trunk the 24-port 10Gbps VCs to get an effective 240Gpbs combined throughput?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;********************************************************************************************************************&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;Paul replied:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;*******************************************************************************************************************&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;While LACP does make a large bandwidth pipe from the VC module to the upstream switch, the standard dictates that traffic from any given server is restricted to a single uplink.&amp;nbsp; If that uplink should fail, then that server’s traffic would failover to another uplink in the LACP group.&amp;nbsp; SO, from a particular server’s perspective, LACP is a availability play, not a bandwidth play.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;****************************************************************************************************************&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;Ken also got into the discussion:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;************************************************************************************************************&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;Adding to what Paul said…&amp;nbsp; in aggregate across multiple servers connected to the VC module, you will be able to take full advantage of the bandwidth provided by the LACP group.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;*****************************************************************************************************************&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;Any additional comments regarding this subject? Let us know your thoughts.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 13:05:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>chuckk281</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-05-05T13:05:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>VC performance question</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/vc-performance-question/m-p/1599#M33947</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;Abhishek had a customer ask about VC pperformance vs. Pas-thru Modules:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;**********************************************************************************************************&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;Are there any performance benchmarks available for VC, in terms of impact on throughput? A customer is interested in the comparison between situations where a VC is used and where a pass-through is used.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;Along the same lines – what is the level of LACP support on VC and how does LACP affect the throughput seen by the servers?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;In principle, LACP should allow aggregation of available VC uplinks into a trunk, hence is it possible to connect N wires across VCs and get a trunk of Nx between them; ie. Say if we link up 8 wires between 1Gbps ports between VC1 and VC2, will the servers behind them see a total throughput of 8Gbps?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;How far does this solution scale – can we trunk the 24-port 10Gbps VCs to get an effective 240Gpbs combined throughput?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;********************************************************************************************************************&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;Paul replied:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;*******************************************************************************************************************&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;While LACP does make a large bandwidth pipe from the VC module to the upstream switch, the standard dictates that traffic from any given server is restricted to a single uplink.&amp;nbsp; If that uplink should fail, then that server’s traffic would failover to another uplink in the LACP group.&amp;nbsp; SO, from a particular server’s perspective, LACP is a availability play, not a bandwidth play.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;****************************************************************************************************************&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;Ken also got into the discussion:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;************************************************************************************************************&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;Adding to what Paul said…&amp;nbsp; in aggregate across multiple servers connected to the VC module, you will be able to take full advantage of the bandwidth provided by the LACP group.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;*****************************************************************************************************************&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;Any additional comments regarding this subject? Let us know your thoughts.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 13:05:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/vc-performance-question/m-p/1599#M33947</guid>
      <dc:creator>chuckk281</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-05T13:05:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

