<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Multi-Enclosure Stacking paper V2 in BladeSystem - General</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/multi-enclosure-stacking-paper-v2/m-p/1506#M33949</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Nice document. &amp;nbsp;It would be interesting to see a pro's and cons section or to gauge on this thread&amp;nbsp; what people are seeing in the field. &amp;nbsp;E.g. the benefits of cable aggregation and a fast internal network vs resilience. &amp;nbsp;If the base chassis containing the managers were to fail for instance then I assume the remaining 3 chassis will function from a LAN perspective but the manager chassis would need to be brought back online to make any changes?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've mainly seen single chassis or non-stacked chassis with VCEM control in the field though there is much more interest in stacking now that it is mature.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 10:22:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>fishyuk</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-04-12T10:22:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Multi-Enclosure Stacking paper V2</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/multi-enclosure-stacking-paper-v2/m-p/1480#M33948</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Chris in our Technical Pre-Sales team has updated the technical paper on Multi-Enclosure Stacking.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;*************************************************************************************************************&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;Hey Team&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;I’ve edited and changed the multi-enclosure stacking paper.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;I’ve added some content and modified the graphics.&amp;nbsp; I have also edited the stacking examples as well.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;*****************************************************************************************************************&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Be among the first to review it and comment back to Chris.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 14:55:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/multi-enclosure-stacking-paper-v2/m-p/1480#M33948</guid>
      <dc:creator>chuckk281</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-04-01T14:55:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multi-Enclosure Stacking paper V2</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/multi-enclosure-stacking-paper-v2/m-p/1506#M33949</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Nice document. &amp;nbsp;It would be interesting to see a pro's and cons section or to gauge on this thread&amp;nbsp; what people are seeing in the field. &amp;nbsp;E.g. the benefits of cable aggregation and a fast internal network vs resilience. &amp;nbsp;If the base chassis containing the managers were to fail for instance then I assume the remaining 3 chassis will function from a LAN perspective but the manager chassis would need to be brought back online to make any changes?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've mainly seen single chassis or non-stacked chassis with VCEM control in the field though there is much more interest in stacking now that it is mature.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 10:22:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/multi-enclosure-stacking-paper-v2/m-p/1506#M33949</guid>
      <dc:creator>fishyuk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-04-12T10:22:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multi-Enclosure Stacking paper V2</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/multi-enclosure-stacking-paper-v2/m-p/1547#M33950</link>
      <description>On page 8 the document references "SFP+ DAC" as an alternative to the CX4 connectors. I am unable to find these as an option on the Flex-10 Quickspecs. Is this an unreleased option? Or am I missing it?</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 15:12:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/multi-enclosure-stacking-paper-v2/m-p/1547#M33950</guid>
      <dc:creator>GrahamZulauf</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-04-23T15:12:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multi-Enclosure Stacking paper V2</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/multi-enclosure-stacking-paper-v2/m-p/1604#M33951</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Just want to confirm as it doesn't appear I can take advantage of this. I have two c7000 enclosures, each with slots 1-4 populated with 1/10 ethernet Virtual Connect modules. I was hoping to be able to keep my vmotion traffic for vsphere contained to a private network i had build in the first encolsure.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 15:28:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/multi-enclosure-stacking-paper-v2/m-p/1604#M33951</guid>
      <dc:creator>Duhaas_2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-05T15:28:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

