https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/setting-cache-ratio/m-p/4256835#M3652 I have a number of blade servers that are citrix terminal servers. These servers host 1 application, any saving/writing is done to network shares and an external db servers. No user is really writing or saving to the local server. Any suggestions on cache ration? 100%write; 50% read 50% write? Sat, 23 Aug 2008 23:05:35 GMT Tom Green_1 2008-08-23T23:05:35Z https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/setting-cache-ratio/m-p/4256835#M3652 I have a number of blade servers that are citrix terminal servers. These servers host 1 application, any saving/writing is done to network shares and an external db servers. No user is really writing or saving to the local server. Any suggestions on cache ration? 100%write; 50% read 50% write? Sat, 23 Aug 2008 23:05:35 GMT https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/setting-cache-ratio/m-p/4256835#M3652 Tom Green_1 2008-08-23T23:05:35Z https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/setting-cache-ratio/m-p/4256836#M3653 perhaps 100% read and raise the priority of array rebuild. Mon, 25 Aug 2008 14:48:54 GMT https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/setting-cache-ratio/m-p/4256836#M3653 JKytsi 2008-08-25T14:48:54Z https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/setting-cache-ratio/m-p/4256837#M3654 On our windows 2003 Terminal servers (blades and DL's as well) we use 100 % read, but I don't sure you will see any significant performance changes... Mon, 25 Aug 2008 16:27:24 GMT https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/setting-cache-ratio/m-p/4256837#M3654 Igor Karasik 2008-08-25T16:27:24Z