<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: c7000 and uplink throughput in BladeSystem - General</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/c7000-and-uplink-throughput/m-p/4563307#M8803</link>
    <description>By default the VC uplinks are usually set to Auto. Which is to auto form fully active trunks if the trunks are configured by the switch.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So as long as you configure all 8 ports in an etherchannel trunk at the switch end (single or stacked switchs) on the VC end they will auto configure to an 8GB trunk.</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 13:40:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Adrian Clint</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-01-13T13:40:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>c7000 and uplink throughput</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/c7000-and-uplink-throughput/m-p/4563303#M8799</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am just wondering and to understand more:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In a C7000 encosure with 6 VC Ethernet modules loaded    (3 active, 3 standby and Four 1GB uplink port on each Ethernet module)    and, if we uplink all the ports on the active bays 1,3,5,7 to a single uplink ether channel and standby bay module ports on 2,4,6,8 to another single uplink ether channel connected to a  different switch, using trunk option in a cisco switching environment.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Do i get 16GB trunk throughput of active and  16GB throughput of standby. Any issues with this coniguration?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 03:21:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/c7000-and-uplink-throughput/m-p/4563303#M8799</guid>
      <dc:creator>UK-Blr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-13T03:21:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: c7000 and uplink throughput</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/c7000-and-uplink-throughput/m-p/4563304#M8800</link>
      <description>Uday, You can only have etherchannel trunks from a single VC module. You cannot span a trunk accross different VCs. So with 8 VC modules you would have eight 4GB trunks.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What you could do is buy 10GB CX4 0.5m stacking cables and connect up all the VC modules then you could have four 8GB trunks.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As for active/passive - that depends on your VC network design. You could have them all active.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 09:26:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/c7000-and-uplink-throughput/m-p/4563304#M8800</guid>
      <dc:creator>Adrian Clint</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-13T09:26:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: c7000 and uplink throughput</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/c7000-and-uplink-throughput/m-p/4563305#M8801</link>
      <description>Thanks for clarifying. Yes we have cx4 cable for vc module communication/redundancy.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 10:08:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/c7000-and-uplink-throughput/m-p/4563305#M8801</guid>
      <dc:creator>UK-Blr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-13T10:08:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: c7000 and uplink throughput</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/c7000-and-uplink-throughput/m-p/4563306#M8802</link>
      <description>with this in mind, it created one more new question.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Assume if we have two different active 4gb Access port uplinks from different vc ethernet module. &lt;BR /&gt;Later if we add the whole active  8 gb uplink nics(4gb + 4gb)connected to a single vmware virtual  switch, how does it behave.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:14:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/c7000-and-uplink-throughput/m-p/4563306#M8802</guid>
      <dc:creator>UK-Blr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-13T12:14:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: c7000 and uplink throughput</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/c7000-and-uplink-throughput/m-p/4563307#M8803</link>
      <description>By default the VC uplinks are usually set to Auto. Which is to auto form fully active trunks if the trunks are configured by the switch.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So as long as you configure all 8 ports in an etherchannel trunk at the switch end (single or stacked switchs) on the VC end they will auto configure to an 8GB trunk.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 13:40:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/c7000-and-uplink-throughput/m-p/4563307#M8803</guid>
      <dc:creator>Adrian Clint</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-13T13:40:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: c7000 and uplink throughput</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/c7000-and-uplink-throughput/m-p/4563308#M8804</link>
      <description>ok...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;heregoes more details.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;One ether channel access port for 4 uplinks in VC module-1&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;One more ether channel access port of 4 uplinks in VC module-3&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So i have total 8Gb uplink, if we combine alotgether in vmware virtual switch.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am sure this creates routing issues, because of two different ether access  channels, combined using vmware vswitch.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;But, just searching is this option works really or not.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 13:46:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/c7000-and-uplink-throughput/m-p/4563308#M8804</guid>
      <dc:creator>UK-Blr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-13T13:46:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: c7000 and uplink throughput</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/c7000-and-uplink-throughput/m-p/4563309#M8805</link>
      <description>That just gives you two 4GB uplinks (as they are through different VCs).&lt;BR /&gt;So thats "Scenario 10: Network failover with LACP" in the Virtual Connect Ethernet Cookbook. "The uplinks connected to VC-Enet module 1 and 3 cannot be combined for aggregated bandwidth". So its 4GB Active/4GB Passive.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Take a look at Scenario 11, 12A or 12B in the cookbook to get 8GB usable bandwidth.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 14:58:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/bladesystem-general/c7000-and-uplink-throughput/m-p/4563309#M8805</guid>
      <dc:creator>Adrian Clint</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-13T14:58:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

