<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic HPE Synergy Server Profiles and VMware vSphere Distributed Switching in HPE Synergy</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-synergy/hpe-synergy-server-profiles-and-vmware-vsphere-distributed/m-p/7200934#M1549</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Greetings,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was reading through the VMware on Synergy Best Practice Guide at: &lt;A href="https://www.hpe.com/psnow/doc/a00042559en_us" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.hpe.com/psnow/doc/a00042559en_us&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The guide is date from 2017, which is a bit old.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I manage an environment with 2 frames, multiple Synergy 480Gen10, and Virtual Connect SE 100Gb F32 Modules and I wanted to know the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The Server contains Synergy 4820C 10/20/25Gb CNA. The server profile of this host has the following connections:&lt;BR /&gt;1 Mgmt_A Mgmt-ESXi_Set (network set) Mezzanine 3:1-a&lt;BR /&gt;2 Mgmt_B Mgmt-ESXi_Set (network set) Mezzanine 3:2-a&lt;BR /&gt;3 SAN_A SAN-A Fabric attach Mezzanine 3:1-b&lt;BR /&gt;4 SAN_B SAN-B Fabric attach Mezzanine 3:2-b&lt;BR /&gt;5 Compute_A Compute_Set (network set) Mezzanine 3:1-c&lt;BR /&gt;6 Compute_B Compute_Set (network set) Mezzanine 3:2-c&lt;BR /&gt;7 vMotion_A vMotion_Set (network set) Mezzanine 3:1-d&lt;BR /&gt;8 vMotion_B vMotion_Set (network set) Mezzanine 3:2-d&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We have a virtual Distributed Switch, and the above connections (1,2,5,6,7,8) correspond to the six physical uplinks defined in the one virtual Distributed switch. The respective portgroups are configured to use specific uplinks.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Is this acceptable best practice&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;?&lt;BR /&gt;Should there be separate distributed switches for Mgmt, Compute, and vMotion?&lt;BR /&gt;Should we be using LACP-S (S-channels) on the NIC pairs? We did not set it up that way.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2023 02:44:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>tirtul</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-11-23T02:44:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>HPE Synergy Server Profiles and VMware vSphere Distributed Switching</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-synergy/hpe-synergy-server-profiles-and-vmware-vsphere-distributed/m-p/7200934#M1549</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Greetings,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was reading through the VMware on Synergy Best Practice Guide at: &lt;A href="https://www.hpe.com/psnow/doc/a00042559en_us" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.hpe.com/psnow/doc/a00042559en_us&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The guide is date from 2017, which is a bit old.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I manage an environment with 2 frames, multiple Synergy 480Gen10, and Virtual Connect SE 100Gb F32 Modules and I wanted to know the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The Server contains Synergy 4820C 10/20/25Gb CNA. The server profile of this host has the following connections:&lt;BR /&gt;1 Mgmt_A Mgmt-ESXi_Set (network set) Mezzanine 3:1-a&lt;BR /&gt;2 Mgmt_B Mgmt-ESXi_Set (network set) Mezzanine 3:2-a&lt;BR /&gt;3 SAN_A SAN-A Fabric attach Mezzanine 3:1-b&lt;BR /&gt;4 SAN_B SAN-B Fabric attach Mezzanine 3:2-b&lt;BR /&gt;5 Compute_A Compute_Set (network set) Mezzanine 3:1-c&lt;BR /&gt;6 Compute_B Compute_Set (network set) Mezzanine 3:2-c&lt;BR /&gt;7 vMotion_A vMotion_Set (network set) Mezzanine 3:1-d&lt;BR /&gt;8 vMotion_B vMotion_Set (network set) Mezzanine 3:2-d&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We have a virtual Distributed Switch, and the above connections (1,2,5,6,7,8) correspond to the six physical uplinks defined in the one virtual Distributed switch. The respective portgroups are configured to use specific uplinks.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Is this acceptable best practice&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;?&lt;BR /&gt;Should there be separate distributed switches for Mgmt, Compute, and vMotion?&lt;BR /&gt;Should we be using LACP-S (S-channels) on the NIC pairs? We did not set it up that way.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2023 02:44:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-synergy/hpe-synergy-server-profiles-and-vmware-vsphere-distributed/m-p/7200934#M1549</guid>
      <dc:creator>tirtul</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-23T02:44:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HPE Synergy Server Profiles and VMware vSphere Distributed Switching</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-synergy/hpe-synergy-server-profiles-and-vmware-vsphere-distributed/m-p/7201642#M1563</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Greetings,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I understand the current set-up &lt;SPAN&gt;with 2 frames, multiple Synergy 480Gen10, and Virtual Connect SE 100Gb F32 Modules.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please be informed that&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;LACP-S (S-channels) on the NIC pairs is enabled by default.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I aslo understand that six physical uplinks are defined in one virtual Distributed switch.&amp;nbsp; From HPE Hardware end, we cannot suggest the required no. of virtual distributed switches. Kindly verify the same once with the VMware Team.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2023 07:13:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-synergy/hpe-synergy-server-profiles-and-vmware-vsphere-distributed/m-p/7201642#M1563</guid>
      <dc:creator>Keerthana_RP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-28T07:13:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HPE Synergy Server Profiles and VMware vSphere Distributed Switching</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-synergy/hpe-synergy-server-profiles-and-vmware-vsphere-distributed/m-p/7201722#M1566</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.hpe.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/2067427"&gt;@Keerthana_RP&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;Thanks. VMware was actually looking for a validated design that says multiple partitions from the same physical port of a CNA is supported in a VDS.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;They refered to page 51 of the doc at: &lt;A href="https://support.hpe.com/hpesc/public/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c04408042&amp;amp;sfdcIFrameOrigin=null" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://support.hpe.com/hpesc/public/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c04408042&amp;amp;sfdcIFrameOrigin=null&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;They also pointed to Dell's stance on this: &lt;A href="https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-in/000179202/what-is-a-common-network-partition-and-teaming-mode-mistake-that-may-result-in-unexpected-network-issues" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-in/000179202/what-is-a-common-network-partition-and-teaming-mode-mistake-that-may-result-in-unexpected-network-issues&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2023 05:09:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-synergy/hpe-synergy-server-profiles-and-vmware-vsphere-distributed/m-p/7201722#M1566</guid>
      <dc:creator>tirtul</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-29T05:09:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

