<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic New Power Level Limits in M and MSM Series</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/m-and-msm-series/new-power-level-limits/m-p/6923089#M5032</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;We noticed that the recent 6.6.5.0 firmware update raised the 5GHz power levels on our MSM430 APs from 10 dbm up to 12 dbm, calling that a new minimum. &amp;nbsp;Does anyone know the reason for that? &amp;nbsp;(Didn't see anything in the release notes.) &amp;nbsp;We operated the power at lower levels to keep cells small.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ron Volkman&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2016 19:12:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ron Volkman</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-12-04T19:12:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>New Power Level Limits</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/m-and-msm-series/new-power-level-limits/m-p/6923089#M5032</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We noticed that the recent 6.6.5.0 firmware update raised the 5GHz power levels on our MSM430 APs from 10 dbm up to 12 dbm, calling that a new minimum. &amp;nbsp;Does anyone know the reason for that? &amp;nbsp;(Didn't see anything in the release notes.) &amp;nbsp;We operated the power at lower levels to keep cells small.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ron Volkman&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2016 19:12:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/m-and-msm-series/new-power-level-limits/m-p/6923089#M5032</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ron Volkman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-12-04T19:12:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

