<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Explanation of bugs in M and MSM Series</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/m-and-msm-series/explanation-of-bugs/m-p/5391847#M517</link>
    <description>HP is aware of the untagged VLAN issue and they are working on it, the other issue i'm not sure, you can simply log a case with the support and if they say anything ask for a business escalation ;)</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 05:08:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ISoliman</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-11-16T05:08:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Explanation of bugs</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/m-and-msm-series/explanation-of-bugs/m-p/5387033#M500</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Can someone from HP clarify the two bugs cited below for E-series controllers?&amp;nbsp; These are from the 5.5.3 release notes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;102860 Clients roaming to untagged VLANs cannot communicate with the network&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is a very serious issue that should have prevented the software release if it is as general as the text implies.&amp;nbsp; Are there more specifics on when this happens?&amp;nbsp; This will prevent us from upgrading to this release or any other that contains this bug unless it is narrower than it sounds.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;53704 Wireless clients fail to be authenticated when the controller is configured to use an&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Active Directory server with a NetBIOS name that differs from the Windows domain&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;name. To avoid this problem, make both names the same.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you guys working on this or do you assume we should just change the domain&amp;nbsp;name?&amp;nbsp; Just to let you know, this is a very common domain configuration especially on older, larger networks because Windows domain naming has different naming requirements than NetBIOS did.&amp;nbsp; Often both names must continue to exist for quite a long time due to legacy applications and servers that are using the NetBIOS name instead of the Windows domain name.&amp;nbsp; A question to HP would be why do you care if they are different and why do you even need to use both?&amp;nbsp; This is another bug that will prevent users from moving forward off of buggy software.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You have two other undocumented bugs that I have reported several times and keep being told is not a bug or cannot be duplicated.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1 . The issue is with AD authentication on teamed controllers.&amp;nbsp; There is only the web option to join the domain only at the team or team manager controller levels.&amp;nbsp; The problem is that any non-manager controllers are NOT joined to the domain and any access points that are connected to the non-manager controller cannot authenticate off AD.&amp;nbsp; The work-around is to join the non-manager controllers from the CLI interface.&amp;nbsp; Then all users authenticate just fine.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2.&amp;nbsp; It seems that after every controller reboot, it is necessary to rejoin the controllers to the domain.&amp;nbsp; We don't understand why this is the case.&amp;nbsp; Most of the time the controllers web interface shows them as joined when they actually are not.&amp;nbsp; Entering the data and rejoining the domain seems to fix the issue.&amp;nbsp; This requires us to intervene every time a controller gets bounced which is not good.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know you are going to tell me to contact support again.&amp;nbsp; The reason you are seeing the post here is that I am tired of HP support telling me you "never heard of that" when I report issues that later show up in release notes or on this forum.&amp;nbsp; It is really frustrating to be ignored and then see that many other people have experienced the same thing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steven Naslund&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 16:10:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/m-and-msm-series/explanation-of-bugs/m-p/5387033#M500</guid>
      <dc:creator>snaslund</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-10T16:10:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Explanation of bugs</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/m-and-msm-series/explanation-of-bugs/m-p/5391847#M517</link>
      <description>HP is aware of the untagged VLAN issue and they are working on it, the other issue i'm not sure, you can simply log a case with the support and if they say anything ask for a business escalation ;)</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 05:08:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/m-and-msm-series/explanation-of-bugs/m-p/5391847#M517</guid>
      <dc:creator>ISoliman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-16T05:08:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

