- Community Home
- >
- Networking
- >
- Switching and Routing
- >
- Aruba & ProVision-based
- >
- Re: GVRP - Best Pratice ?
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-07-2007 11:51 PM - last edited on тАО03-03-2014 06:05 PM by Maiko-I
тАО08-07-2007 11:51 PM - last edited on тАО03-03-2014 06:05 PM by Maiko-I
Hi! I have read this PDF:
http://www.hp.com/rnd/support/config_examples/gvrp_use.pdf
But I don┬┤t understand if GVRP is a recommended solution to use ?
We got 2 x 5406 with about 15 VLANs routed in 5406, and 5 VLANs for different DMZs only located in our datacenter.
As edge switches we got a mix with 2626 (15) and 2810-48g (6).
In the future we will probably setup 802.1x for dynamic VLANs for different users and unauth users.
Any advice how to use or not use gvrp ?
I have got MSTP and VRRP up and running.
Best Regards, Magnus
P.S. This thread has been moevd from Switches, Hubs, Modems (Legacy ITRC forum) to ProCurve / ProVision-Based. - Hp Forum Moderator
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-08-2007 12:30 AM
тАО08-08-2007 12:30 AM
SolutionThe advantage of GVRP is that you only need to configure the VLAN on one switch (probably your core switch), the edge switches will then learn it automatically.
Not many people use it though and generally prefer to use static VLANs.
I just noticed another limitation with GVRP is that: While GVRP is enabled on the switch, you cannot apply any ACLs to VLANs configured on the same switch.
If you are using 802.1x though, you could work around this by applying RADIUS assigned port-based ACL's on the edge ports which is more efficient than ACL's in the core anyway. The Identity Driven Manager (IDM) software makes configuring these a lot easier if you are interested, although that is another large project in itself.
So really you need to weigh up the benefits of GVRP over the disadvantages:
1. GVRP makes adding a new VLAN to all your switches very easy and also reduces the chance that you misconfigure a static VLAN.
2. GVRP is not good for MSTP load balancing
3. GVRP prevents ACL's being applied on VLAN interfaces.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-08-2007 12:53 AM
тАО08-08-2007 12:53 AM
Re: GVRP - Best Pratice ?
In switch with GVRP enabled I must manually assign ports to vlans or it must do workstations connected to such ports ?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-08-2007 01:20 AM
тАО08-08-2007 01:20 AM
Re: GVRP - Best Pratice ?
One security risk with GVRP is that unless you disable it on your edge-ports, someone could come in and plug another switch in which is also GVRP enabled, and then put themselves into any VLAN they wish. Just something to keep in mind anyway when considering GVRP.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-08-2007 01:51 AM
тАО08-08-2007 01:51 AM
Re: GVRP - Best Pratice ?
/Magnus
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-09-2007 08:38 AM
тАО08-09-2007 08:38 AM
Re: GVRP - Best Pratice ?
"While GVRP is enabled on the switch, you cannot apply any ACLs to VLANs
configured on the same switch." I tried it on a 5400 switch and I can still assign ACLs to static configured VLANs. I believe they forgot to mention that it is for automatically learned VLANs only.
The full advantage with GVRP comes when using dynamically assigned VLANs doing 802.1X or MAC authentication. Than you do not need to configure the VLANs on the ports.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-09-2007 06:43 PM
тАО08-09-2007 06:43 PM