Aruba & ProVision-based
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

HP 2920 + Ubiquiti Nanobeam

 
SOLVED
Go to solution
besc
Advisor

HP 2920 + Ubiquiti Nanobeam

Hello,

I can't seem to get a ping response from our Nanobeam connected to an HP Procurve 2920 for a PTP connection.

A snippet of the config file:

J9729A_LR(config)# sh config

Startup configuration: 45

; J9729A Configuration Editor; Created on release #WB.15.12.0015
; Ver #05:18.41.ff.35.0d:9b

hostname "J9729A_LR"
module 1 type j9729a
trunk 47 trk1 trunk
no telnet-server
ip default-gateway 172.16.1.1
interface 23
   name "LR2ISR"
   exit
interface 47
   flow-control
   name "TRUNK_1"
   exit
interface 48
   name " "
   exit
snmp-server community "public" unrestricted
oobm
   ip address dhcp-bootp
   exit
vlan 1
   name "MANAGEMENT"
   no untagged 1-22
   untagged 24-46,48,A1-A2,B1-B2
   tagged 23,Trk1
   ip address 172.16.1.23 255.255.255.0
   exit
vlan 16
   name "LR2ISR"
   tagged 23,Trk1
   no ip address
   exit
spanning-tree
spanning-tree Trk1 priority 4
no tftp server
no autorun
no dhcp config-file-update
no dhcp image-file-update
password manager
password operator

Any help will be greatly appreciated!

Regards,

Bar

6 REPLIES
Vince-Whirlwind
Honored Contributor

Re: HP 2920 + Ubiquiti Nanobeam

What port is the "Nanobeam" patched to? What is its config? Its IP address? What are you pinging it from?

What is "LR2ISR"? FW/Router? 

besc
Advisor

Re: HP 2920 + Ubiquiti Nanobeam

Hello Vince,

Thanks for asking.

The Nanobeam is connected to port 23 under VLAN 16.

From our office, we configured the both antennas and perfectly worked fine on an unmanaged switch. We assumed somehow that it will work the same on a managed switch. Other PCs connected to the same switch are perfectly fine. We, also, send a ping from the switch's CLI to the antenna but to no avail.

Did I miss invoking something on the config?

16again
Respected Contributor

Re: HP 2920 + Ubiquiti Nanobeam

At first sight, it looks like port 23 has both vlan1 and vlan16 tagged to Ubiquity.  Is that intentional?

besc
Advisor

Re: HP 2920 + Ubiquiti Nanobeam

Hello 16again,

Yes, as per the last configuration during field testing. Should it be removed?

Regards,

Bar

16again
Respected Contributor

Re: HP 2920 + Ubiquiti Nanobeam

As stated AP was pingable when connected to an unmanaged switch,  so management VLAN should most likely be untagged.

 

besc
Advisor
Solution

Re: HP 2920 + Ubiquiti Nanobeam

PROBLEM SOLVED

Port 23 was tagged to the Management VLAN (VLAN 1) and it was untagged under PTP VLAN (VLAN 16). TRK1 was also tagged to VLAN16.