How to Bind mac address in HP 2920-24G-PoE+ Switch (J9727A)

[sunilkumar19]

How to Bind mac address in HP 2920-24G-PoE+ Switch (J9727A)

we have created 4 vlans in the switch i want to bind one particular mac address to one specific IP for one vlan which is not in DHCP range.

Please help me...Thanks id advance.

[GuruP]

Creating a dhcp-server static-bind pool in 2920 : and enabling dhcp-server in that vlan should bind IP-to-MAC , config below

dhcp-server pool "test"
   lease infinite
   static-bind ip 192.168.100.10 255.255.255.0 mac 001871-80b914
   exit

vlan 1
   name "DEFAULT_VLAN"
   no untagged 1/1
   untagged 1/2-1/48,2/1-2/48
   ip address 192.168.100.2 255.255.255.0
   dhcp-server
   exit

Hope this helps!

[sunilkumar19]

Thanks For your reply.

when i ran the first line commane getting below message ?

DHCP server should be disabled before changing the configuration.

Do i really need to disable the DHCP pool before changing the confguration.

[GuruP]

Yes, If the DHCP-server is running then it needs to be disabled before making any changes in DHCP. To check the DHCP server status:->

HP-Stack-2920# sh dhcp-server

 Configuration and Status - DHCP Server

  DHCP Server Enabled       : No 
  DHCPv4 Operational Status : Disabled     
  Traps Enabled             : Yes
  Persistent Lease Database : No   
  Conflict Logging Enabled  : No 
  DHCP VLAN Interfaces      :          

HP-Stack-2920#

[sunilkumar19]

Getting below error while trying the bind command.

Cannot configure static bind address when network address or range is configured.

can someone help on this?

[Natunoemi]

I have the same issue, can anyone help please?

static-bind ip 192.168.114.225 255.255.255.0 mac aabbcc-112233
Cannot configure static bind address when network address or range is configured.

this is my dhcp config

dhcp-server pool "MGMT"
default-router "192.168.114.1"
dns-server "192.168.0.3,192.168.0.4"
domain-name "test.local"
network 192.168.114.0 255.255.255.0
range 192.168.114.100 192.168.114.200
exit

[E-AA]

Ran into this old thread seeking answer to a whole'nother thing and tought I'd be the one giving an answer for a change, in case someone else ends up here looking for the answers asked here:

In my experience, you need to define a separate pool for each individual static bind even if all other parameters (gw, dns, etc) are the same (go figure why HP chose that approach cause is a real pain the $$ if you have a bunch of statics).