- Community Home
- >
- Networking
- >
- Switching and Routing
- >
- Aruba & ProVision-based
- >
- Procurve/Provision: ILLEGAL 802.1Q VLAN tagging
-
- Forums
-
- Advancing Life & Work
- Advantage EX
- Alliances
- Around the Storage Block
- HPE Ezmeral: Uncut
- OEM Solutions
- Servers & Systems: The Right Compute
- Tech Insights
- The Cloud Experience Everywhere
- HPE Blog, Austria, Germany & Switzerland
- Blog HPE, France
- HPE Blog, Italy
- HPE Blog, Japan
- HPE Blog, Middle East
- HPE Blog, Russia
- HPE Blog, Saudi Arabia
- HPE Blog, South Africa
- HPE Blog, UK & Ireland
-
Blogs
- Advancing Life & Work
- Advantage EX
- Alliances
- Around the Storage Block
- HPE Blog, Latin America
- HPE Blog, Middle East
- HPE Blog, Saudi Arabia
- HPE Blog, South Africa
- HPE Blog, UK & Ireland
- HPE Ezmeral: Uncut
- OEM Solutions
- Servers & Systems: The Right Compute
- Tech Insights
- The Cloud Experience Everywhere
-
Information
- Community
- Welcome
- Getting Started
- FAQ
- Ranking Overview
- Rules of Participation
- Tips and Tricks
- Resources
- Announcements
- Email us
- Feedback
- Information Libraries
- Integrated Systems
- Networking
- Servers
- Storage
- Other HPE Sites
- Support Center
- Aruba Airheads Community
- Enterprise.nxt
- HPE Dev Community
- Cloud28+ Community
- Marketplace
-
Forums
-
Blogs
-
Information
-
English
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-06-2018 10:14 AM
03-06-2018 10:14 AM
Procurve/Provision: ILLEGAL 802.1Q VLAN tagging
Page 251: "Override "illegal" packet priorities set by upstream devices or applications that use 802.1Q VLAN tagging 802.1p priority tags."
What are "illegal" packet priorities?
More importantly: How does one OVERRIDE them?
Thanks in advance.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-07-2018 09:35 PM
03-07-2018 09:35 PM
Re: Procurve/Provision: ILLEGAL 802.1Q VLAN tagging
For example, you might have a user who ius running a video-conferencing software app on their desktop, and that software might allow the user to set his own DSCP/IP precedence vlues on the packets generated from that software. The user might think, "Ha, I'm going to set everything to the max so I get full priority". You then have the potential issue of
- voice and video traffic flooding the highest-priority, very low-bandwidth, switch queue which is designed to carry critical network messaging>
- video traffic flooding the priority, low-bandwidth, queue designed to carry voice.
The document you are reading describes how you override those bad values:
1/ identify the traffic type using access lists
2/ use classifiers to match access-list matches to classes
3/ use policy actions to assign values as per the identified classification.
The policy action would identify, as an example,
- voice RTP traffic and assign it ip precedence "6" ("5" in a mixed vendor network), DSCP EF(46)
- video traffic "5" and AF41(34)
- media signalling "3" and AF31(26)
- default traffic "0" and BE(0)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-08-2018 04:27 AM
03-08-2018 04:27 AM
Re: Procurve/Provision: ILLEGAL 802.1Q VLAN tagging
For simplicity, to force the "ILLEGAL" traffic to HPE's Q3 (802.1p - priotiy = 0), would I set all traffic other than voip and video to Q3 similar to the examples listed below????
VLAN 111
qos priority 0
exit
VLAN 222
qos priority 0
exit
VLAN 333
qos priority 0
exit
Thank you.
Hewlett Packard Enterprise International
- Communities
- HPE Blogs and Forum
© Copyright 2021 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP