- Community Home
- >
- Networking
- >
- Switching and Routing
- >
- Aruba & ProVision-based
- >
- Re: Procurve/Provision: ILLEGAL 802.1Q VLAN tagg...
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-06-2018 10:14 AM
тАО03-06-2018 10:14 AM
Procurve/Provision: ILLEGAL 802.1Q VLAN tagging
Page 251: "Override "illegal" packet priorities set by upstream devices or applications that use 802.1Q VLAN tagging 802.1p priority tags."
What are "illegal" packet priorities?
More importantly: How does one OVERRIDE them?
Thanks in advance.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-07-2018 09:35 PM
тАО03-07-2018 09:35 PM
Re: Procurve/Provision: ILLEGAL 802.1Q VLAN tagging
For example, you might have a user who ius running a video-conferencing software app on their desktop, and that software might allow the user to set his own DSCP/IP precedence vlues on the packets generated from that software. The user might think, "Ha, I'm going to set everything to the max so I get full priority". You then have the potential issue of
- voice and video traffic flooding the highest-priority, very low-bandwidth, switch queue which is designed to carry critical network messaging>
- video traffic flooding the priority, low-bandwidth, queue designed to carry voice.
The document you are reading describes how you override those bad values:
1/ identify the traffic type using access lists
2/ use classifiers to match access-list matches to classes
3/ use policy actions to assign values as per the identified classification.
The policy action would identify, as an example,
- voice RTP traffic and assign it ip precedence "6" ("5" in a mixed vendor network), DSCP EF(46)
- video traffic "5" and AF41(34)
- media signalling "3" and AF31(26)
- default traffic "0" and BE(0)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-08-2018 04:27 AM
тАО03-08-2018 04:27 AM
Re: Procurve/Provision: ILLEGAL 802.1Q VLAN tagging
For simplicity, to force the "ILLEGAL" traffic to HPE's Q3 (802.1p - priotiy = 0), would I set all traffic other than voip and video to Q3 similar to the examples listed below????
VLAN 111
qos priority 0
exit
VLAN 222
qos priority 0
exit
VLAN 333
qos priority 0
exit
Thank you.