- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- HPE BladeSystem
- >
- BladeSystem - General
- >
- Re: C3000 "device identification data error"
BladeSystem - General
1752653
Members
5381
Online
108788
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-21-2011 11:35 AM
тАО03-21-2011 11:35 AM
Re: C3000 "device identification data error"
Replaced (again) the SB40c main board as first replacement one was defective resulting in the OA reporting "device identification error".
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-22-2011 02:54 AM
тАО03-22-2011 02:54 AM
Re: C3000 "device identification data error"
Greate :)
BR
/jag
BR
/jag
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-25-2011 07:48 AM
тАО03-25-2011 07:48 AM
Re: C3000 "device identification data error"
You did not state if you have an HP maintenance contract, or this is warranty.
With the outsourcing of spare parts to UPS logistics, I have noticed that the quality of parts delivered to customer sites has suffered.
You might want to record the serial number of any board which is removed as suspect, or known defective; and make sure the same board doesn't come back again.
I have seen spare parts packages shipped from the depot without "defective" return labels...
Just my own private opinion. Your mileage may vary.
With the outsourcing of spare parts to UPS logistics, I have noticed that the quality of parts delivered to customer sites has suffered.
You might want to record the serial number of any board which is removed as suspect, or known defective; and make sure the same board doesn't come back again.
I have seen spare parts packages shipped from the depot without "defective" return labels...
Just my own private opinion. Your mileage may vary.
Problems Solved
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-25-2011 07:55 AM
тАО03-25-2011 07:55 AM
Re: C3000 "device identification data error"
Yes, we were fortunately under maintenance contract. I am aware that the replacemenet parts can "resurface" as not checked by logistics - we always stick the defective sticker on the box, but then how do we know what happens after, if the device gets checked properly or not. All I can say is that the replacement parts we receive look perfectly new and not used in any way. I suspect this problem to be an unsuccessful programming of the mainboard flash through the JTAG port - maybe the checksum values were not written correctly as the ROM worked. This defective board to me looked like an "origin" defect (manufacturing), not a repair problem. I point my finger to Quality Control here.
- « Previous
-
- 1
- 2
- Next »
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP