- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- HPE BladeSystem
- >
- BladeSystem - General
- >
- Re: vc-enet and flex-10
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-03-2010 01:39 PM
тАО03-03-2010 01:39 PM
We have a single C7000 (1 domain) bladecenter with two vc-enet modules installed in bay 1 and 2. Today we got two flex-10 modules and they have been installed in bay 5 and 6 - Bay 3 and 4 is used for fiberchannel. All the VC modules is running firmware 2.31.
I am getting a stacking error:
The Virtual connect Manager has discovered the VC-Enet module stacking listed below. The Connection Status below indicates whenether all VC-Enet modules are interconnected and accessible.
Connection status: FAILED
from / to
bay1:portx0 -> bay2:portx0
bay5:portx7 -> bay6:portx7
bay5:portx8 -> bay6:portx8
Do I need to cable the vc-enet in bay1 with the flex-10 in 5? - CX4 (and 2 to 7) The stacking error has appeared after the flex-10 modules was installed, so the link from bay1 to bay 2 must be okay.
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-03-2010 04:05 PM
тАО03-03-2010 04:05 PM
SolutionYes, you should run CX4 cables from Bay1 Port X1 to Bay5 Port x1, and from Bay2 Port X1 to Bay6 Port X1.
It is not necessary to link Bay5 to Bay6. They are hard linked across the Midplane via port X0 on each module.
Stacking links are only applied vertically.
HTH
Dave.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-04-2010 12:16 PM
тАО03-04-2010 12:16 PM
Re: vc-enet and flex-10
Dave is correct, but this is really an optional step depending on your planned network configuration.
Do you plan on blade NICs 1/2 needing to connect to network resources across the uplinks in the Flex 10 modules? Do you have NICs installed into mezzanine slot 2 of your blades that need to connect through the standard VC-Enet modules?
If either answer is "yes" then you need to use the CX4 cable to attach
bay1:X1 -> bay5:X0
bay2:X1 -> bay6:X0
If the answer to both is "no" then you can safely ignore the stacking error. The three "from/to" links that you listed are all internal and are likely working fine. The page unfortunately still shows "FAILED" as the status if there are any bays not vertically linked.
good luck, points are appreciated if our answers helped
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-04-2010 01:11 PM
тАО03-04-2010 01:11 PM
Re: vc-enet and flex-10
Thank you for answering.
We have both old G5 and new G6 servers in the chassis. I have been told that we need to remove the old PC-ENet modules from bay1/2 and move the flex-10 modules to bay1/2. If we don't do this all the onboard networkcards will run 1Gb, as there is no network cards installed in mezzanine 1/2. This makes sense..
The flex-10 modules will each have 2 links to the core switch. Is it correct that we will have 40Gb for the servers? - 20Gb if one flex-10 module FAILS.
How many nics will be avalible for each blade with this configuration? As I understand it, each blade will support 4 nics/uplink. We need to access minimum 5 networks on each blade (VMware) and would like to have flex-10 doing the VLAN tagging etc. as it is hardware accelerated.
Best regards.
Asbj├Г┬╕rn Morell.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-08-2010 08:47 AM
тАО03-08-2010 08:47 AM
Re: vc-enet and flex-10
This also means you will only be able to connect to 4 networks at a time on the G6 servers and 1 network on the G5 servers unless you do one of these two things:
>>Install additional network modules in the enclosure and mezzanine NICs into each blade.
OR
>>Enable trunking on the server rather than the Virtual Connect.
good luck!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-08-2010 09:30 AM
тАО03-08-2010 09:30 AM
Re: vc-enet and flex-10
I must emphasize that the Virtual Connect Manager (VCM) ONLY runs in either Bay 1 or Bay 2. Without the vertical stacking links, VCM knows nothing about the other VC Ethernet modules in bays 5 & 6. It recognizes that there are other VC ENet modules installed (hence the FAILED messages) however it cannot manage the ports or uplinks on those modules and you will not be able to provision profiles which require reference to the ports on those modules.
As I said at the beginning, I'm probably misunderstanding the statement, but unless you are using your flex10's as some weird kind of passthrough, then I would say that the Vertical Stacking Links are necessary.
Dave.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-08-2010 12:53 PM
тАО03-08-2010 12:53 PM
Re: vc-enet and flex-10
Each onboard and mezzanine NIC is hard-coded to exit the enclosure via a single module. If you want traffic to exit the enclosure via uplinks on a different module, you need stacking. If you have different virtual networks configured for different module pairs (as we do), external stacking links aren't necessary.
-Jamie
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-08-2010 03:00 PM
тАО03-08-2010 03:00 PM
Re: vc-enet and flex-10
For example - if you were to turn on "private" for every network then there is no comms between downlinks within the VC... so no need for stacking.
A good reason to stack is to have a cluster heatbeat network or a vmotion network that could be using different NICs on different servers. Then all the heartbeat or vmotion traffic can run around within the 4 VC modules and never leaves the enclosure.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-09-2010 06:06 AM
тАО03-09-2010 06:06 AM
Re: vc-enet and flex-10
Thanks for the information, I didn't actually realize that. In retrospect, what you say makes sense, however I am not sure about the advisability of imply to people that it is "OK to run in a degraded state". Ignoring these warning messages is probably habit-forming and will probably bite you later in the game.
Since 0.5m CX4 cables cost <$100, the smart thing would be to fix the problem rather than ignore it.
In addition, adding the stacking links would open up options for pathing and redundency which are not available right now.
Dave.