- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- HPE BladeSystem
- >
- BladeSystem - General
- >
- Any concerns raised by your Network/Telcomm Group ...
BladeSystem - General
1752587
Members
3969
Online
108788
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-24-2009 02:30 PM
тАО02-24-2009 02:30 PM
Any concerns raised by your Network/Telcomm Group about using VC?
We are current blades users, but use integrated fibre and ethernet pass thru. Our Network/Telecomm Group has not supported a move to virtual connect in the past due to a concerns about support and manageability. While we feel these are not well founded, we wanted to see if others in the community have experienced similar concerns and what they did to overcome them. Thanks very much...
2 REPLIES 2
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-25-2009 02:13 AM
тАО02-25-2009 02:13 AM
Any concerns raised by your Network/Telcomm Group about using VC?
Hi there, The question:"Is it a device they we have to manage or not?", is one of responsability/accountability. Saying yes, you loose a part of your departments flexibility and a piece of your enclosure becomes a sort of blackbox to you, changes to the VC needs to be asked using the proper channels etcetc... This is, imho a downside but can be turned into an upside also. You don't have to support it/upgrade it. Keep in mind however that in a blade enclosure everything is tied together. This means you update the VC ethernet and it also impacts the VC fibre channel modules in some cases. So a danger lurks behind the corner. You could for example let them take responsability for the config and support of the device, BUT keep control in saying that every change to the config needs to be initiated by you. That way they are covered :) However I think it's important to keep the control of the VC in your department. You don't need it to manage your enclosure but it helps ALOT. A good setup needs to be tested and validated with them, once that's done, nothing stands in your way of using this tech. Well just my 2c...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-26-2009 07:44 AM
тАО02-26-2009 07:44 AM
Any concerns raised by your Network/Telcomm Group about using VC?
We're in the throes of rolling out a C7000 setup with VC 1-10GB and VC Flex-10 modules. Our approach is to have the entire config locked down on a unix machine and it can take the machine from bare metal to fully configured in a few minutes. That way it's easy to fix things and run verifications to see if anything has changed. In this way when we hand it over to Ops to run we can give them simple CLI commands to maintain the machines, keeping them away from the internals as much as possible. We love them dearly but no way will we want them to be driving a web browser to add in enet-connections or the like.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP