- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- HPE BladeSystem
- >
- BladeSystem - General
- >
- Re: VC FF 20/40 and Stacking
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-21-2016 05:10 AM
04-21-2016 05:10 AM
VC FF 20/40 and Stacking
We have (5) c7000 enclosures in (2) data centers, each is populated with VCE 1/10 modules (Bays 1 & 2) and VCF 4Gb modules (Bays 3 & 4) configured with Active (Bay 1)/SAN Fabric A (Bay 3) and Standby (Bay 2)/SAN Fabric B (Bay 4). We also have the enclosures configured as single domain, with each enclosure using a unique HP-predefined range for virtual MAC and virtual WWPN.
We're in the process of purchasing VC FlexFabric 20/40 modules for Bays 1 & 2 in all, but one of the enclosures to replace both VCE & VCF modules to accommodate the new Gen9 blades. We're also replacing the older Cisco 3750-X (network) and legacy HP SAN Switch 4/32B (SAN) with Cisco Nexus 5672UPs for TOR switches.
Since we're going to have to reconfigure Virtual Connect, should I take this opportunity to reconfigure as multi-enclosure/single domain and interconnect the enclosures to reduce the number of 10GbE and 8Gb FC uplinks going to the Nexus TOR switches? Should we retain the Active/Standby configuration or is there an Active/Active configuration that would better support the mapped VLANs managed within VC? Thank you.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-07-2016 04:52 AM
07-07-2016 04:52 AM
Re: VC FF 20/40 and Stacking
I wouldn't go with stacking the enclosures unless you really must do to get uplink bandwidth, OneView does not support stacked enclosures so I expect this method to be used less and less by people architecting and supporting enclosures.
You will get more bandwidth if you do go active/active and unless you have a lot of east/west traffic between servers in your enclosures - its the way to go.