- Community Home
- >
- Networking
- >
- Switching and Routing
- >
- Comware Based
- >
- Re: 6125G Tunnel question
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-29-2014 02:29 PM
08-29-2014 02:29 PM
6125G Tunnel question
I'm working on establishing a set of tunnels between two pairs of 6125G switches. What I'd like to be able to do is to anchor the destination address of the tunnel to a VRRP VIP at the VRRP VIP at the remote location so that I don't have to establish a mesh of tunnels. this is possible in Cisco-land, but I can't seem to get it to work here. Am I missing something, or is there a design issue with the switch. I can ping the VIP of the remote switches from the local switch and the VRRP status is correct. I can also see the VRRP MAC address of the VIP so there should be no reason why the tunnel woulnd't establish with the VIP as the destination address.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-31-2014 11:12 AM
08-31-2014 11:12 AM
Re: 6125G Tunnel question
Otherwise what about if you setup the tunnel towards the loopback interface of the other device and then have a routing for that /32 pointing with nexthop to the vrrp ip?